Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 10
Representation ID: 7832
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8321
Yes – the guidance in NPPF and NPPG – especially in relation to Grey Belt
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 11
Representation ID: 7837
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8326
Variation of Option B is preferred – see our Option D below [attached]
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 12
Representation ID: 7840
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8329
Yes : as follows OPTION D : “Sustainable settlements & Infrastructure solutions” Delivered through : Green Belt release, delivering growth in sustainable settlements with supporting infrastructure with proportionate growth based on scale and status Our OPTION D would deliver the following spatial distribution and a total of c. 29,025 units: City & Sub Regional Centre : Chester At least 7,000 Principal Town : Ellesmere Port At least 5,000 Principal Town : Northwich At least 4,000 Principal Town : Winsford At least 3,000 Principal Town : Middlewich No figure defined Market Town : Neston & Parkgate At least 1,500 Market Town : Frodsham At least 1,000 Strategic Service Centres (4) : Helsby, Cuddington & Sandiway, Tarporley, Malpas Up to 750 in each = 3,000 Key Service Centres (5) : Kelsall, Tattenhall, Tarvin, Farndon and Christleton Up to 500 in each = 2,500 Local Service Centres (27) : Antrobus, Ashton Hayes, Aldford, Childer Thornton, Comberbach, Crowton, Delamere, Dodleston, Duddon, Eaton, Eccleston, Elton, Great Barrow, Great Budworth, Guilden Sutton, Higher Wincham, Kingsley, Little Budworth, Mickle Trafford, Moulton, No Mans Heath, Norley, Saughall, Tilston, Utkinton, Waverton and Willaston Up to 75 in each = 2,025
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 13
Representation ID: 7845
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8334
Yes – redevelopment of brownfield (PDL) sites, small scale housing expansion, housing infill, community led housing, exception housing
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 14
Representation ID: 7848
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8337
No
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 16
Representation ID: 7850
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8339
No
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 17
Representation ID: 7852
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8341
Yes – Our OPTION D is most closely aligned with Option B, albeit it is based upon a slightly amended Settlement Hierarchy and spatial distribution of housing growth as set out above, which would total 28,250 dwellings.
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 18
Representation ID: 7857
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8346
No
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 20
Representation ID: 7858
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8347
Yes
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 21
Representation ID: 7861
Received: 03/09/2025
Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust
I&O_8350
Willing landowners / promoters and site deliverability
Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.