Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Search representations

Results for Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust search

New search New search

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 10

Representation ID: 7832

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8321
Yes – the guidance in NPPF and NPPG – especially in relation to Grey Belt


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 11

Representation ID: 7837

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8326
Variation of Option B is preferred – see our Option D below [attached]


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 12

Representation ID: 7840

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8329
Yes : as follows OPTION D : “Sustainable settlements & Infrastructure solutions” Delivered through : Green Belt release, delivering growth in sustainable settlements with supporting infrastructure with proportionate growth based on scale and status  Our OPTION D would deliver the following spatial distribution and a total of c. 29,025 units: City & Sub Regional Centre : Chester At least 7,000 Principal Town : Ellesmere Port At least 5,000 Principal Town : Northwich At least 4,000 Principal Town : Winsford At least 3,000 Principal Town : Middlewich No figure defined Market Town : Neston & Parkgate At least 1,500 Market Town : Frodsham At least 1,000 Strategic Service Centres (4) : Helsby, Cuddington & Sandiway, Tarporley, Malpas Up to 750 in each = 3,000 Key Service Centres (5) : Kelsall, Tattenhall, Tarvin, Farndon and Christleton Up to 500 in each = 2,500 Local Service Centres (27) : Antrobus, Ashton Hayes, Aldford, Childer Thornton, Comberbach, Crowton, Delamere, Dodleston, Duddon, Eaton, Eccleston, Elton, Great Barrow, Great Budworth, Guilden Sutton, Higher Wincham, Kingsley, Little Budworth, Mickle Trafford, Moulton, No Mans Heath, Norley, Saughall, Tilston, Utkinton, Waverton and Willaston Up to 75 in each = 2,025


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 13

Representation ID: 7845

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8334
Yes – redevelopment of brownfield (PDL) sites, small scale housing expansion, housing infill, community led housing, exception housing


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 14

Representation ID: 7848

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8337
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 16

Representation ID: 7850

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8339
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 17

Representation ID: 7852

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8341
Yes – Our OPTION D is most closely aligned with Option B, albeit it is based upon a slightly amended Settlement Hierarchy and spatial distribution of housing growth as set out above, which would total 28,250 dwellings.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 18

Representation ID: 7857

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8346
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 20

Representation ID: 7858

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8347
Yes


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question SS 21

Representation ID: 7861

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_8350
Willing landowners / promoters and site deliverability


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.