Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 7896

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8385
Largely unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station, school and pub but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7897

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8386
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has no other support services and facilities.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7898

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8387
Largely unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station, school and pub but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance. We do, however, see merit in ELT01, 2 and 3.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7899

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8388
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has no other support services and facilities.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7901

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8390
Largely unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station, school and pub but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance. We do, however, see some merit in LOS2 and 3 but they do have access issues to contend with.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7902

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8391
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station and a pub, but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has no other support services and facilities.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7903

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8392
Yes, but it could be enhanced - Chester should be identified as the principle “driver for growth” in the Borough. Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7905

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8394
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7906

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8395
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 7907

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Acresfield Development Discretionary Trust

I&O_8396
Maybe


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.