Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 1580

Received: 08/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire Travel Services

I&O_1689
As a lifelong  Frodsham resident I am writing to formally object to the proposed housing development on Green Belt land, specifically sites FRO01 and FRO02, as part of the Local Plan 2025 consultation. I believe the development of these sites is not in the best interests of Frodsham, its residents, or the wider community, and I would like to outline my concerns. 1. Loss of Green Belt Land The development of sites FRO01 and FRO02 would result in the significant loss of Green Belt land, which plays an essential role in preserving the character and openness of the area. Green Belt land is meant to prevent urban sprawl, protect the countryside, and provide space for agriculture and recreation. The proposed development would undermine these fundamental principles and lead to a permanent loss of valuable green space. 2. Impact on Local Environment and Wildlife Both sites are home to a variety of wildlife and contribute to the local ecosystem. Developing these areas would destroy habitats and lead to the displacement of species, which would have a negative impact on local biodiversity. The environmental consequences of such a development should not be underestimated, especially given the climate crisis and the need to preserve natural spaces. 3. Traffic and Infrastructure Strain The proposed housing development would significantly increase the population of Frodsham, which in turn would put additional pressure on local infrastructure, including roads, public transport, schools, and healthcare facilities. The area is already facing challenges with traffic congestion, and the addition of new homes without a clear plan to improve infrastructure would exacerbate these issues. There is also concern over the environmental impact of increased traffic emissions. 4. Inadequate Consultation and Community Input I am also concerned about the adequacy of the consultation process. Many residents have not been properly informed about the scale of the proposed development or its potential impact on the local community. A more transparent and inclusive process is necessary to ensure that all stakeholders are fully aware of the implications and can provide meaningful input. 5. Alternative Sites There may be other, more suitable sites for development that do not involve encroaching on Green Belt land. The Council should explore alternative options, including previously developed land (brownfield sites), which would help alleviate housing demand while preserving the integrity of the Green Belt. 6. Housing Need and Sustainability While there is a clear need for housing, it is crucial that development is sustainable and aligned with the needs of the local community. The proposed housing development should consider not only the number of houses but also the type, affordability, and long-term sustainability of the homes. It is essential that new developments are designed with regard to the existing infrastructure and the overall quality of life for residents. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, I strongly object to the inclusion of sites FRO01 and FRO02 in the Local Plan 2025 and urge Cheshire West and Chester Council to reconsider its approach to development in the area. I ask that the Council take into account the environmental, social, and economic consequences of developing on Green Belt land and look for more sustainable and less damaging alternatives. I trust my concerns will be carefully considered as part of the consultation process. Should you require any further information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me.