Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for CWAC search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question MI 1
Representation ID: 7415
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: CWAC
I&O_7895
YES IN PRINCIPLE
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question MI 2
Representation ID: 7420
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: CWAC
I&O_7900
WE SHOULD ENSURE THE AREA IS NOT OVER DEVELOPED FOR HOUSING. THERE NEEDS TO BE A REVIEW OF TRANSPORT AND THE IMPACTS OF ANY NEW DEVELOPMENTS NETWORK
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question MI 5
Representation ID: 7425
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: CWAC
I&O_7905
THE CHESHIRE FRESH SITE WAS ALLOCATED FOR EMPLOYMENT AND THAT SHOULD STAY IN PLACE
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question MI 4
Representation ID: 7426
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: CWAC
I&O_7906
NO ANY ALLOCATIONS SHOULD BE MADE BY CWAC
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question MI 3
Representation ID: 7429
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: CWAC
I&O_7909
WITH THE CHANGES TO HOUSING SUPPLY BOTH COUNCILS SHOULD WORKING ON ALIGNING THERE LOCAL PLAN TIME LINES
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 80
Representation ID: 7436
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: CWAC
I&O_7916
ANY GROWTH IN LOSTOCK HAS TO ENSURE THERE IS SUFFICENT INFRASTRUCTURE IN PLACE TO SUPPORT IT
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 82
Representation ID: 7441
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: CWAC
I&O_7921
HIGHWAYS AND ROAD SAFETY IS A MAJOR CONCERN WITHIN LOSTOCK GRALAM AND NEEDS IMPROVING
