Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for Friends of Park Fields search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 11
Representation ID: 13037
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Friends of Park Fields
I&O_13556
The Friends of Park Fields have a 10 year management agreement for Park Fields we are also officially recognised as consultation partners for any development proposal on the land. Any development of the green belt particularly the fields adjacent Parkfields to Boathouse lane -(these fields for many years have until last year had been laying dormant , un used for agricultural land and therefore have become land of specific natural interest) are significant concern for The Friends of Park Fields. Having been made aware of the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate, we are writing to express our deep concerns on behalf of our 130 local members over the plans. We are strongly opposed to the proposal and concerned that development will undermine the work we are doing on Park Fields to improve the biodiversity of the area. We also feel that this level of development will significantly adversely affect the natural beauty of Parkgate which so many people enjoy In answer to *Question SS 11* my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt* We would also wish to ensure that the Friends group are acknowledged as special interest group and are involved in any future consultantion
Option A - Retain the Green Belt
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 54
Representation ID: 13038
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Friends of Park Fields
I&O_13557
The Friends of Park Fields have a 10 year management agreement for Park Fields we are also officially recognised as consultation partners for any development proposal on the land. Any development of the green belt particularly the fields adjacent Parkfields to Boathouse lane -(these fields for many years have until last year had been laying dormant , un used for agricultural land and therefore have become land of specific natural interest) are significant concern for The Friends of Park Fields. Having been made aware of the proposed large-scale development on Green Belt land in and around Neston and Parkgate, we are writing to express our deep concerns on behalf of our 130 local members over the plans. We are strongly opposed to the proposal and concerned that development will undermine the work we are doing on Park Fields to improve the biodiversity of the area. We also feel that this level of development will significantly adversely affect the natural beauty of Parkgate which so many people enjoy In answer to *Question SS 11* my choice is: *Option A – Retain the Green Belt* We would also wish to ensure that the Friends group are acknowledged as special interest group and are involved in any future consultantion
Option A - Retain the Green Belt