Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 11203

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

SS 61
I&O_11701
It is unclear from the Issues and Option document if minerals safeguarding has been considered as a constraint for any of the above potential growth areas. We would welcome sight of detailed MRAs for each of the sites being proposed where known MSAs exist. Frustratingly, the settlement area and key constraint plans do not show MSAs and as such it is not possible to provide meaningful comment on site specific policy proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 11204

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

SS 67
I&O_11702
It is unclear from the Issues and Option document if minerals safeguarding has been considered as a constraint for any of the above potential growth areas. We would welcome sight of detailed MRAs for each of the sites being proposed where known MSAs exist. Frustratingly, the settlement area and key constraint plans do not show MSAs and as such it is not possible to provide meaningful comment on site specific policy proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 11205

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

SS 70
I&O_11703
It is unclear from the Issues and Option document if minerals safeguarding has been considered as a constraint for any of the above potential growth areas. We would welcome sight of detailed MRAs for each of the sites being proposed where known MSAs exist. Frustratingly, the settlement area and key constraint plans do not show MSAs and as such it is not possible to provide meaningful comment on site specific policy proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 11207

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

SS 73
I&O_11705
It is unclear from the Issues and Option document if minerals safeguarding has been considered as a constraint for any of the above potential growth areas. We would welcome sight of detailed MRAs for each of the sites being proposed where known MSAs exist. Frustratingly, the settlement area and key constraint plans do not show MSAs and as such it is not possible to provide meaningful comment on site specific policy proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 11209

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

SS 76
I&O_11707
It is unclear from the Issues and Option document if minerals safeguarding has been considered as a constraint for any of the above potential growth areas. We would welcome sight of detailed MRAs for each of the sites being proposed where known MSAs exist. Frustratingly, the settlement area and key constraint plans do not show MSAs and as such it is not possible to provide meaningful comment on site specific policy proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 11211

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

SS 79
I&O_11709
It is unclear from the Issues and Option document if minerals safeguarding has been considered as a constraint for any of the above potential growth areas. We would welcome sight of detailed MRAs for each of the sites being proposed where known MSAs exist. Frustratingly, the settlement area and key constraint plans do not show MSAs and as such it is not possible to provide meaningful comment on site specific policy proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 11212

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

SS 82
I&O_11710
It is unclear from the Issues and Option document if minerals safeguarding has been considered as a constraint for any of the above potential growth areas. We would welcome sight of detailed MRAs for each of the sites being proposed where known MSAs exist. Frustratingly, the settlement area and key constraint plans do not show MSAs and as such it is not possible to provide meaningful comment on site specific policy proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 11213

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

SS 85
I&O_11711
It is unclear from the Issues and Option document if minerals safeguarding has been considered as a constraint for any of the above potential growth areas. We would welcome sight of detailed MRAs for each of the sites being proposed where known MSAs exist. Frustratingly, the settlement area and key constraint plans do not show MSAs and as such it is not possible to provide meaningful comment on site specific policy proposals.

Comment

Representation ID: 11214

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

EG 5
I&O_11712
Under “Protection of employment land and premises” any proposals for alternative uses on allocated employment land must consider the “agent of change” principle.

Comment

Representation ID: 11215

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Mineral Products Association Ltd

HO 15
I&O_11713
The policy should include reference to MSAs, which should be avoided when it comes to built development which would sterilise mineral resources.