Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 9417

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9912
Yes – the guidance in NPPF and NPPG – especially in relation to Grey Belt


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9418

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9913
Variation of Option B is preferred – see our Option D below [attached]


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9419

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9914
Yes : as follows OPTION D : “Sustainable settlements & Infrastructure solutions” Delivered through : Green Belt release, delivering growth in sustainable settlements with supporting infrastructure with proportionate growth based on scale and status  Our OPTION D would deliver the following spatial distribution and a total of c. 29,025 units: City & Sub Regional Centre : Chester At least 7,000 Principal Town : Ellesmere Port At least 5,000 Principal Town : Northwich At least 4,000 Principal Town : Winsford At least 3,000 Principal Town : Middlewich No figure defined Market Town : Neston & Parkgate At least 1,500 Market Town : Frodsham At least 1,000 Strategic Service Centres (4) : Helsby, Cuddington & Sandiway, Tarporley, Malpas Up to 750 in each = 3,000 Key Service Centres (5) : Kelsall, Tattenhall, Tarvin, Farndon and Christleton Up to 500 in each = 2,500 Local Service Centres (27) : Antrobus, Ashton Hayes, Aldford, Childer Thornton, Comberbach, Crowton, Delamere, Dodleston, Duddon, Eaton, Eccleston, Elton, Great Barrow, Great Budworth, Guilden Sutton, Higher Wincham, Kingsley, Little Budworth, Mickle Trafford, Moulton, No Mans Heath, Norley, Saughall, Tilston, Utkinton, Waverton and Willaston Up to 75 in each = 2,025


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9421

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9916
Yes – redevelopment of brownfield (PDL) sites, small scale housing expansion, housing infill, community led housing, exception housing


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9422

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9917
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9423

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9918
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9424

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9919
Yes – Our OPTION D is most closely aligned with Option B, albeit it is based upon a slightly amended Settlement Hierarchy and spatial distribution of housing growth as set out above, which would total 28,250 dwellings.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9425

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9920
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9426

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9921
Yes


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9427

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9922
Willing landowners / promoters and site deliverability


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.