Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 9495

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9990
Yes


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9499

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9994
Yes


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9503

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_9998
Maybe, subject to what is proposed


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9506

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_10001
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9508

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_10003
Yes


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9510

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_10005
Yes, but it could be enhanced - Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9511

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_10006
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9513

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_10008
Yes – to provide and maintain local distinctiveness and separation


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9514

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_10009
Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9515

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees & Beneficiaries of Ms D Bentley dec'd

I&O_10010
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.