Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 9725

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10221
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9726

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10222
Yes


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9727

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10223
Yes, but it could be enhanced - Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9728

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10224
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9729

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10225
Yes – to provide and maintain local distinctiveness and separation


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9730

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10226
Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9731

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10227
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9732

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10228
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9733

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10229
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9734

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10230
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.