Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 11010

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11508
Yes, we agree.

Comment

Representation ID: 11011

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11509
Keep the current policy.

Comment

Representation ID: 11012

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11510
The following wording should be removed- “where there is a surplus; the facility is no longer capable for use; “

Comment

Representation ID: 11013

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11511
Yes, we agree.

Comment

Representation ID: 11014

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11512
Yes agree.

Comment

Representation ID: 11015

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11513
Yes

Comment

Representation ID: 11016

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11514
Consideration needs to be given to Water pressure for each dwelling and can the sewer system cope with large developments?

Comment

Representation ID: 11017

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11515
Yes, we agree.

Comment

Representation ID: 11018

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11516
Yes, the key settlement gaps currently defined in Local Plan (Part Two) policy GBC 3 should be reviewed. There should be a defined settlement gap surrounding all settlements that currently have a clear gap between that settlement and any adjacent settlements. e.g. between Weaverham and Hartford, Weaverham and Cuddington/ Sandiway, Weaverham and Barnton, Weaverham and Acton Bridge, Weaverham and Northwich (Winnington).

Comment

Representation ID: 11019

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11517
It should be included in the policy and what is set out in the local plan part 2 should be retained.