Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 8660

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9151
All options would lead to significant highway impacts and it does beg the question about whether the Warrington Road can sustain potential growth that relies upon it Given the proximity of Northwich, and the options located there for growth, one does question whether new growth at Cuddington/Sandiway would simply continue to rely upon Northwich and/or be out-commuting to Manchester


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8661

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9152
FAR1 suffers from floodrisk and highly constrained access (Townfield Lane) FAR2 comprises some of eth best quality agricultural land in the Borough and certainly out of any option in Farndon its BMV rating ranks head and shoulder above all others – access is constrained to the south and would be reliant off Sibbersfield Lane FAR3 comprises sports pitches / community land


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8663

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9154
FROD1 and 2 suffers from poor access and comprises quality BMV FROD3 appears the most logical


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8664

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9155
HEL1 and 3 appear the most logical fits HEL2 suffers from access issues


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8665

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9156
KEL02 is the most logical fit; it comprises land that is readily accessed off the main Chester Road and is close to all services and facilities – it benefits from strong defensible barriers (A54) and development on most sides KEL01, despite being open countryside (and not Green Belt) actually is more poorly located and would result in all highway and other impacts being felt throughout the village; moreover its landscape quality is more sensitive than KEL02


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8666

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9157
MAl1 and MAL5 are the best options as they are the least constrained by access MAL2, 3 and 4 all suffer from quite extreme access constraints; and MAL3 would have impacts upon the Conservation Area and also perhaps presents the greatest landscape and visual impact of all options


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8671

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9162
NEP3 , 4 and 5 are the most logical locations NEP1 and 6 are more remote to the core of the settlement and less logical with more constraints associated with accessibility


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8680

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9172
TARP1may struggle to provide good access solutions TARP2 feels the most logical fit TARP3, 4 and 5 all suffer from access issues and would have the greatest impact upon the historic village core


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8683

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9175
TARV3 offers logical infill TARV2 feels the next most logical fit TARV1 would break the A54 boundary


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 8685

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Bellway Homes (North West) Ltd and Bloor Homes Ltd

I&O_9177
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has just a pub and a tennis club. Its proximity to Weaverham and Northwich, which are better suited to delivering growth, means any new residents here would be having to rely upon those services and outcommuting to Manchester.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.