Comment

Representation ID: 17098

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Mrs A Stockdale

I am totally in agreement with the Neighbourhood plan for Christleton and Littleton. I have lived here for many years. We are a couple of distinct rural villages separated from Chester and that is how it should remain. We have distinct housing, some very old and much very individual. We need the guidelines of this plan to keep our locality different from mass building, allowing only small scale low density development. We need our green breathing spaces, protecting our wildlife and current diversity as we have busy A roads to either side of our joint area.

Comment

Representation ID: 17099

Received: 08/06/2026

Respondent: Mrs Katja Prince

Here’s a 99-word summary:

As a resident of Christleton, I strongly support the Neighbourhood Plan policies protecting Green Gap 2, the orchard and the former Law College playing field. These areas help preserve the village’s distinct identity, maintain separation from surrounding settlements and protect the rural character that makes Christleton special. They provide valuable opportunities for recreation, contribute to residents’ wellbeing and offer important environmental benefits through wildlife habitats and biodiversity corridors. The orchard is a historic landscape feature, while the playing field contributes to the village’s open and spacious setting. Together, these spaces are vital assets that deserve protection

Comment

Representation ID: 17100

Received: 06/06/2026

Respondent: Marina Cassidy

I am writing to formally express my support for the Neighbourhood Plan put forward by Christleton and Littleton Parish Councils in relation to the proposed housing development of approximately 200 homes near our community.
I believe the Neighbourhood Plan reflects the priorities and long-term interests of local residents. It seeks to ensure that development is sustainable, proportionate, and supported by adequate infrastructure. Growth should enhance our community rather than place additional strain on services and facilities that are already under pressure.
The main concerns and areas of opposition regarding the proposed 200-home development include:
1. Traffic and Road Safety
The local road network, including Village Road and surrounding lanes, already experiences congestion, particularly at peak times and near schools. A development of this size would significantly increase vehicle movements, raising concerns about safety and access, the traffic through Christleton is already very busy at peak times and we are used as a rat run between A41 and A51 another 200 houses would impact considerably.
2. Pressure on Local Services
Local GP surgeries, schools, and other public services are operating close to capacity. Without guaranteed investment in infrastructure, this scale of development risks overwhelming essential services.
3. Flood Risk and Drainage
Parts of the surrounding area are known to experience drainage issues and surface water flooding. Residents are concerned that further development could worsen flood risk unless robust mitigation measures are clearly demonstrated.
4. Impact on Green Space and Rural Character
The countryside setting and open farmland surrounding Christleton and Littleton are fundamental to the character of our villages. Large-scale housing development risks eroding this identity and reducing valued green space.
5. Infrastructure Before Development
Many residents feel that infrastructure improvements should be delivered and operational before large housing schemes proceed, not promised retrospectively.
The Neighbourhood Plan represents a carefully considered approach that balances the need for housing with the protection of community character, safety, and sustainability. I therefore urge the Council to give full weight to the Plan when considering this application and to ensure that any development aligns with locally agreed priorities.
Thank you for considering my views.

Comment

Representation ID: 17101

Received: 06/06/2026

Respondent: Miss Charlotte Oliver

I am writing to fully support the Neighbourhood Plan for Christleton and Littleton Regulation 16

As the demand for houses ever increases it is importance to protect our historic villages form being over developed and losing their charm and character, for which they are renowned. Christleton regularly features in magazines and has been given the accolade of being one of the prettiest villages in Cheshire, ( Cheshire and Great British life 2012 ) and voted one of the best places to live in the North West by the Sunday Times in 2022 and 2024 quoting "This best-of-both-worlds village is a premium postcode with two outstanding state schools, three roaringly good pubs, and upmarket homes in a delightfully rural setting. “. Developers are not interested in protecting these areas and are only interested in turning over profits. For this reason it is vital to have this Neighbourhood Plan in place for the protection and interest of these villages and its residents.

Green Gaps:
Protecting the Green Gaps I feel is one of the most important features of the Neighbourhood plan These green gaps help create a separation between villages and communities and provide access to the open countryside, it is these open spaces that is what makes the area so attractive to live and help to prevent the potential for urban sprawl.
The A41 which passes through a lot of the green gaps is already extremely busy and struggles to cope with the existing traffic flow on many occasions, it would struggle even more with extra traffic produced by further development in the area.
Green Gap 2 is of particularly importance to protect, it is a large open area that separates Littleton from Christleton, and has a foot path running through it enjoyed by many of the locals walking their dogs, running, cycling and those just wanting to go for a stroll in the peaceful countryside. It provides a tranquil space and a sense of wellbeing for all who use it and a habitat for the local wildlife. It must be protected as it would be a great tragedy to both villages if this space was lost to developers and turned into a large housing estate, Christleton and Littleton would never be the same again.

Local Green Spaces:
These spaces are within the village community and serve to protect the centre of the villages from being overbuilt, they help preserve the openness and character of the village and are what makes these villages attractive and give them their beauty, tranquility and charm, they also provide areas where communities can congregate and exercise and be in touch with nature.
Local green space 1,(LG1) is of particular interest to me being a local resident to it. I feel it is of great importance to protect this space to maintain the charm and character of Grade II listed Christleton Hall, Developers have already built on the old car park of Christleton College, however they are still in possession of 1) The Walled Garden/ Orchard and 2) what was once the College playing field at the front, These areas of land are not only of historical interest, but give Christleton Hall and the new development a unique backdrop that makes these houses more than just another new development.
The planning application for these recently built houses was approved with the condition that The Walled Garden retained 12 of the original ancient apple trees and further trees planted following completion of the development. The orchard was to be replanted (including the rare fruit trees that were “accidentally” removed) to provide a pleasant natural habitat for local wildlife flora and fauna. The planning application suggested that the orchard would also be a peaceful haven for all residents and the local community to enjoy. The original management plan given to the residents of the new development for managing the surrounding area shows that this area was also to be managed by the residents backing the claim for communal access, the plan has since changed. The area is unique in the fact that it has walls on all sides providing shelter from the elements and protecting smaller and vulnerable species. it is also a feature of the Grade II listed Christleton Hall, it should therefore be protected as part of Christleton Hall .and not treated as a separate entity, The developers however are already requesting changes to the plans to reinstate the orchard in a “planning discharge application” of the development, My fear is that if this space is not protected, the developers will keep pressing to build multiple houses on there which will change the character and look and appeal of the area

It is also of great interest to preserve “the playing field” as a local green space. It is bordered with mature trees to protect the new development from the noise and views of the heavy traffic on the busy A55, It also provides a back drop to the historic Christleton Hall, which would pale into insignificance it the area was ever built on, Historically it has been used as a playing field for the College of law and has been used and enjoyed by many of the local community for walking their dogs and other recreational activities. Many residents to the new development chose this development over others due the rural feel the field gives the area and were advised the field would be there for their use. Bridgemere had also committed to the Parish Council that the playing field would be accessible green space for the village. Now the houses have been sold, the field has been fenced off and access denied and the villagers can no longer access the space and enjoy it and I feel this is a loss to a lot of the community who used it. Access should be reinstated as committed by Bridgemere. The playing field also provides a natural habitat for many local wildlife, it is a known passageway for badgers, rabbits and foxes which are among a few of the habitants, buzzards and other birds of prey have also been spotted here where food is evidently of plenty and they feel it is safe.
These areas are not grey space and therefore should NOT be earmarked for potential development, I understand the quota for new housing in Christleton is 15, 8 of which are already under construction alongside the canal, therefore there is no reason why these spaces should be considered for potential future development and identifying them for protection in the Neighbourhood plan is the only way to prevent this.
In summary I am writing in support of the Neighbourhood plan and particularly request the protection of all these green spaces which are a fundamental part of our villages and community. If these spaces are lost they are gone from our villages forever and the character and charm of these villages are lost with it

Thank you for your time

Comment

Representation ID: 17102

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Mrs Carol Mannion

I am writing to express my strong support for protecting the green spaces that are such an important part of historic Christleton village near Chester.

These green areas are far more than undeveloped land. They provide vital habitats for birds, pollinators, small mammals, and native plants, while offering residents and visitors opportunities for recreation, exercise, and enjoyment of nature. They also contribute to physical and mental wellbeing, help reduce flooding, improve air quality, and preserve the unique rural character and heritage of Christleton.

I am deeply concerned that ongoing development pressures could lead to the loss of these valuable green spaces and the wildlife they support. Once such areas are built on, they are extremely difficult to replace, and the damage to local biodiversity and village character can be permanent.

I urge you to prioritise the protection and enhancement of Christleton’s green spaces by:

- Safeguarding existing green areas from inappropriate development.
- Protecting wildlife habitats and supporting biodiversity through conservation and restoration.
- Ensuring that all planning decisions fully consider environmental impacts and the long-term interests of the community.
- Preserving the historic setting and distinctive character of Christleton village.
- Encouraging community involvement in caring for and improving local green spaces.

Protecting these areas is an investment in the future of Christleton, ensuring that residents and future generations can continue to enjoy the natural beauty, wildlife, and heritage that make our village special.

I live on the former Law College site and a positive factor about buying our home was we were led to believe that there would be access for all to public areas within in the walled orchard which is part of Christleton’s and the history of Christleton Hall.
Also we were told that the playing fields were for the use of the villagers for recreation and maintaining and protecting the wildlife that live in these green spaces.
Protecting all of Christleton's green spaces is not about stopping future developments it is about preserving the village’s identity and charm and also help protect our neighbouring villages to

Thank you for considering these concerns.

Comment

Representation ID: 17103

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Paul Mannion

I am writing to express my strong support for the retention and protection of Green Gap 2 within the Christleton Neighbourhood Plan.

Green Gap 2 plays a vital role in preserving the unique character, setting, and identity of the historic village of Christleton. The open green spaces surrounding the village are an integral part of its heritage and contribute significantly to the distinctive landscape that residents and visitors value.

The historic village green and surrounding open countryside have long been central to Christleton’s character. These spaces provide important visual separation from neighbouring developments, maintain the rural setting of the village, support biodiversity, and offer recreational and wellbeing benefits to the community.

The purpose of Green Gap 2 extends beyond preventing settlement coalescence. It helps safeguard the historic environment and protects the green infrastructure that defines Christleton as a distinct and attractive village. Any loss or reduction of this green gap would risk undermining the historic setting of the village and eroding the sense of place that has developed over many generations.

National and local planning policies recognise the importance of protecting landscapes that contribute to the significance and setting of heritage assets. Green Gap 2 provides an important buffer that helps preserve these qualities while ensuring that future growth is directed in a sustainable and appropriate manner.
I also support the need to protect the walled orchard and playing Field on the former Law College site as part of Local Green Space LGS1. I live on this site and in original planning we were told we would have access to the walled orchard and also the playing field.
I therefore urge the Neighbourhood Plan Committee to maintain strong protections for Green Gap 2 and to continue recognising its importance in preserving Christleton’s historic green spaces, rural character, biodiversity, and community identity for future generations.

Comment

Representation ID: 17104

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Mrs Julia Leaman

As a resident of Christleton I am writing in support of the Neighbourhood Plan and in particular the above areas and the plan to protect them.

GREEN GAP 2

The area between Christleton and Littleton has been a lovely stretch of green countryside for hundreds of years and is enjoyed by the people of both villages and surrounding areas. It is important to keep villages separate and not turned into urban sprawl, as happens all too often in our country. Presently the area is used by walkers, cyclists, runners and anyone seeking to be surrounded by old and beautiful trees and green countryside. It is also a home to a diverse range of animals and birds. It is unthinkable that this area would ever be used to build houses on.

LOCAL GREEN SPACE LGS1

Appallingly the old Law College orchard containing protected rare and ancient fruit trees has already been abused by the developers in that the trees have been destroyed. Replacement trees have still to be planted and plans have been submitted to change and develop this ancient and lovely walled garden and quiet space which the local residents, which I am one living in Chancery Gardens, were led to believe would be left alone for us to maintain and enjoy for the future.

Similarly the old Law College rugby pitches, which were used as an attraction for prospective home buyers, and we believed would remain as a vital green space for the residents to enjoy seems to be under threat. Recently this green space has been fenced off and residents are no longer able to walk on this field as we were freely allowed to when we bought our houses. The lovely trees and shrubs around the field also perform the vital role of protecting the residents from the constant loud traffic noise from the adjacent North Wales Expressway flyover. The area has been proven to be a habitat of badgers, bats and foxes and it is delightful to see many types of wild birds, including hawks, kites and buzzards flying over this area.

There is no requirement for extensive new housing in Christleton, I believe the need for new housing was estimated at fifteen more new homes and planning permission is already being considered for 8 new houses on the canal .

In addition our local amenities could not cope with an increase in local population. There is no GP surgery in Christleton or Littleton and the nearby existing GPs are diminishing; Waverton surgery is due to close imminently leaving its patients having to travel to Tarvin or Tarporley and I understand the Health Centre at Boughton is not accepting any more patients, it having reached capacity.

Both Christleton High School and Primary schools are over-subscribed already. Christleton village already has a big traffic problem especially but not only at school times. The A41 is perpetually clogged with traffic disastrously affecting dangerous emissions levels for all locals especially the children making their way to and from school each day.

I very strongly support the continued protection of the above areas for reasons I have stated; preserving village identity, preservation of natural biodiversity and the safeguarding of community assets.

Christleton and Littleton are ancient and lovely villages of which Cheshire can be so proud. Turning them into urban sprawl would be too horrific to contemplate and everything possible needs to be done to protect this small but beautiful and historic part of the world.

Developers must not be given any permission to ruin our precious countryside for their own financial gain.

Comment

Representation ID: 17105

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Andy Leaman

Further to my email attached below dated 8 May 2026 I wish to make the following comments with regard to Green Gap 2..The Orchard and Law College Playing field.
In summary I am in total support of the Policies and Arguments contained in NP Regulation 16.

Re Green Gap 2.
Provides open countryside identity and separation from local neighbourhoods. It adds to character and of most importance is very regularly used by walkers ..dog walkers and children.
Runners and walkers gain exercise adding to their health and well being.
The maintenance of this separation is vital to retain Christleton’s character as is maintaining the habitats of wildlife that occupy this space.ie badgers foxes bats birds of prey.
The development of this land will eliminate a natural asset.

Re The Orchard Walled Garden
Access to The Garden and its recreation on its original site along with the replacement of the ancient trees should be automatic and was a major factor in our house purchase from the developers of our home.

Re The Playing Field
Again having young grandchildren access to the playing field in 2025 was a major asset in buying on this estate. Its fencing off was truly frustrating.
We very much seek that the space is reopened.
So by way of clear repetition I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2, Access to a recreated on site Orchard and access to The Playing Field

Comment

Representation ID: 17106

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Andrea Devaney

I am writing in support of the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, to protect the Green Gap 2, The orchard and the Law Court Playing field.

Christleton has a strong sense of community within a village setting, that is highly valued by the citizens of the village. I am concerned that any proposals to develop the area will have a detrimental effect to the village and the surrounding villages that each all have their own unique identities.

Green gap 2 provides an important habitat and wildlife corridor for a wide range of species, all of which contribute to the biodiversity and ecology of the local area. The loss or fragmentation of this green space would reduce the available habitat for wildlife.

Green gap 2 is a well used recreational space for local residents, which contributes positively to residents physical and mental well-being.

I strongly support the designation of the orchard associated with the former law college site as Local Green Space 1. The orchard forms part of the historic character of the area and should be available to local residents to enjoy.

I support the continued protection of the playing field, also designated as part of LGS1. This open space provides valuable recreational and visual benefits for the local community and contributes significantly to the to the spacious feeling and attractive nature of the area. It is an important community asset and should remain protected from future development.

I understand the original plans for the college park development included access to the walled garden and playing field; these community benefits formed part of the understanding and expectations of many residents when choosing to live in the area.

I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2, the orchard and the playing field within the neighbourhood plan; to protect the village identity, preserve biodiversity, provide recreational opportunities and protect the area for future generations.

Comment

Representation ID: 17107

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Anthony Devaney

I am writing in support of the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, to protect the Green Gap 2, The orchard and the Law Court Playing field.

Christleton has a strong sense of community within a village setting, that is highly valued by the citizens of the village. I am concerned that any proposals to develop the area will have a detrimental effect to the village and the surrounding villages that each all have their own unique identities.

Green gap 2 provides an important habitat and wildlife corridor for a wide range of species, all of which contribute to the biodiversity and ecology of the local area. The loss or fragmentation of this green space would reduce the available habitat for wildlife.

Green gap 2 is a well used recreational space for local residents, which contributes positively to residents physical and mental well-being.

I strongly support the designation of the orchard associated with the former law college site as Local Green Space 1. The orchard forms part of the historic character of the area and should be available to local residents to enjoy.

I support the continued protection of the playing field, also designated as part of LGS1. This open space provides valuable recreational and visual benefits for the local community and contributes significantly to the to the spacious feeling and attractive nature of the area. It is an important community asset and should remain protected from future development.

I understand the original plans for the college park development included access to the walled garden and playing field; these community benefits formed part of the understanding and expectations of many residents when choosing to live in the area.

I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2, the orchard and the playing field within the neighbourhood plan; to protect the village identity, preserve biodiversity, provide recreational opportunities and protect the area for future generations.

Comment

Representation ID: 17108

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Derek Campbell

Protection of Green Gap 2 and Local Green Space 1

I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood plan that seek to protect Green Gap 2 and LGS 1 comprising of the Orchard and Law College playing field.

Green Gap 2 is an important area of open countryside that contributes significantly to the character and identity of Christleton. It provides a valued green setting to the village and importantly, helps to maintain the separation between Christleton and neighbouring settlements. I should be concerned by any proposal to weaken or remove the protections afforded by this area.

Christleton has a strong sense of community and of place and has a distinctive village character. The green gaps surrounding the village play a vital role in preserving this character. Any erosion of these protections would be detrimental not only to Christleton but to surrounding villages, all of which have their own unique identities, histories and community character. The South Cheshire villages have been a unique feature of the county and should continue to be so.

Green gap 2 also provides an important habitat and wildlife corridor for a wide range of species. The area supports badgers, foxes, bats, birds of prey and many common garden bird species all of which contribute to the biodiversity and ecological value of the village. The loss or fragmentation of this green space would inevitably reduce the habitat to wildlife and diminish one of the area’s valuable natural assets.

Green Gap 2 is a well-used recreational space for local residents. It is regularly enjoyed by dog walkers, runners, walkers and others pursuing active and healthy lifestyles. The open countryside setting provides opportunities for exercise, informal recreation and connection with nature all of which contributes positively to residents’ physical and mental wellbeing. Protecting this space will ensure that future generations can continue to benefit from both its environmental and recreational value.

I strongly support the designation and continued protection of the historic orchard associated with the former Law College as part of Local Green Space LGS1. The orchard forms part of the historic character of the area and of the listed building Christleton Hall and it provides important biodiversity benefits.

In addition I strongly support the continued protection of the law College playing field , also designated as an important local green space in LGS1.This open area provides valuable visual benefits to the local communities and provides vital separation from the A55 bypass and the Chester conurbation beyond. It provides an important and valuable wildlife habitat including foxes, birds of prey and badgers. I deed the Landowner has recognised the existence of a badger habitat within the field. The landowner enclosed the field with a fence in 2025 and the enclosure immediately interrupted a badger run causing the animals to invade the gardens of neighbouring houses in search of food. The landowner accepted the impact that had been caused and has since installed badger gates at one end of the field.
For all of these reasons - the protection of the village identity, prevention of settlement coalescence, preservation of biodiversity , provision of recreational opportunities for all age groups, safeguarding of valued community assets I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2 and LGS1 being the orchard and Law College playing field within the environs of Christleton Hall.

Comment

Representation ID: 17109

Received: 07/06/2026

Respondent: Raymund Goeloe

Protection of Green Gap 2 and Local Green Space 1

I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood plan that seek to protect Green Gap 2 and LGS 1 comprising of the Orchard and Law College playing field.

Green Gap 2 is an important area of open countryside that contributes significantly to the character and identity of Christleton. It provides a valued green setting to the village and importantly, helps to maintain the separation between Christleton and neighbouring settlements. I should be concerned by any proposal to weaken or remove the protections afforded by this area.

Christleton has a strong sense of community and of place and has a distinctive village character. The green gaps surrounding the village play a vital role in preserving this character. Any erosion of these protections would be detrimental not only to Christleton but to surrounding villages, all of which have their own unique identities, histories and community character. The South Cheshire villages have been a unique feature of the county and should continue to be so.

Green gap 2 also provides an important habitat and wildlife corridor for a wide range of species. The area supports badgers, foxes, bats, birds of prey and many common garden bird species all of which contribute to the biodiversity and ecological value of the village. The loss or fragmentation of this green space would inevitably reduce the habitat to wildlife and diminish one of the area’s valuable natural assets.

Green Gap 2 is a well-used recreational space for local residents. It is regularly enjoyed by dog walkers, runners, walkers and others pursuing active and healthy lifestyles. The open countryside setting provides opportunities for exercise, informal recreation and connection with nature all of which contributes positively to residents’ physical and mental wellbeing. Protecting this space will ensure that future generations can continue to benefit from both its environmental and recreational value.

I strongly support the designation and continued protection of the historic orchard associated with the former Law College as part of Local Green Space LGS1. The orchard forms part of the historic character of the area and of the listed building Christleton Hall and it provides important biodiversity benefits.

In addition I strongly support the continued protection of the law College playing field , also designated as an important local green space in LGS1.This open area provides valuable visual benefits to the local communities and provides vital separation from the A55 bypass and the Chester conurbation beyond. It provides an important and valuable wildlife habitat including foxes, birds of prey and badgers. I deed the Landowner has recognised the existence of a badger habitat within the field. The landowner enclosed the field with a fence in 2025 and the enclosure immediately interrupted a badger run causing the animals to invade the gardens of neighbouring houses in search of food. The landowner accepted the impact that had been caused and has since installed badger gates at one end of the field.
For all of these reasons - the protection of the village identity, prevention of settlement coalescence, preservation of biodiversity , provision of recreational opportunities for all age groups, safeguarding of valued community assets I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2 and LGS1 being the orchard and Law College playing field within the environs of Christleton Hall.

Comment

Representation ID: 17110

Received: 08/06/2026

Respondent: Mr philip hirst

I completely agree with the recommendations of the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan as submitted by Christleton Parish Council.
I strongly object to the representations made by the developer on the following grounds:
1. Inadequate existing highway infrastructure and no plans to improve it;
2. Danger to health and safety of residents and schoolchildren owing to increased traffic pollution and vehicles;
3. Destruction of of Greenbelt;
4. Utility company states there is no provision of essential water supply, sewers and drainage to service the development, and there are no plans to improve these in the future.

Comment

Representation ID: 17111

Received: 08/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Steven Grant

I am writing to express my support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.

I have particular interest in protecting Green Gap 2 and Local Green Space1 (LG1)

Green Gap 2 is particularly important to protect as the large open area provides a unique, natural separation between the two villages as well as being home to a well used footpath for dog walking, running or just a pleasant walk in the open countryside away from the noise and pollution of the very busy A55, A51 and A41 roads. To loose this open space would be a disaster to the community as the identity of the two village would be lost by over development consisting of one or more large housing developments. The area is home to much wildlife which would be lost forever.

Local Green Space LGS1 is an important green space which has already had access restricted to the public by the erection of fencing. It appears to have started the journey to being totally lost due to the uncaring, profit driven approach of housing developers. When we purchased our house on the College Park Development we were assured by the developers, who own the field, that the College playing field would never be built on and on completion of the development we could enjoy both the open space and the ability to use the field when required for any type of social activity. The field and trees on the border of the A55 act as a break between the houses and the very busy road. It is a known habitat for badgers, rabbits, bats and other wildlife. The planning permission granted for the development of College Park included the retention of the unique historical orchard within the walled garden of the historic Christleton Hall. The developers have destroyed the orchard 'by accident’ and seek to have the condition in the planning permission revoked. It is all now neglected, overgrown, behind locked gates and for sale for development when it was promised to be an asset to be enjoyed by the local community. It is clear the intention is to sell and develop more houses taking up valuable green space in search of profit. I fear this valuable community asset could be lost forever.

I strongly support the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan in its current form for the protection of our local community by avoiding over development.

Comment

Representation ID: 17112

Received: 08/06/2026

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Steward

I am writing this from my grandchild’s email address in order to express my full support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan. I have lived in Christleton for 48 years and the plan is well designed to maintain the character and amenity of the area. I particularly support the plan’s proposals around green spaces and wildlife in the area.

I am in particular opposition to the currently proposed development near Rowton Bridge, as the increased traffic on Rowton Bridge Road would make me feel unsafe as a 86 year old pedestrian and cyclist who uses the road every day. The congestion would also cause a nuisance as well as increased noise and air pollution.

I hope you will take into account the extent of local people’s support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, as well as its depth, thoroughness and thoughtful design.

Comment

Representation ID: 17113

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Kieran Skinner

I support the local and neighbourhood plans as drafted. In particular the proposals relating to the local road network, most specifically the reduction in traffic and speed on the A51.

Comment

Representation ID: 17114

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Alun Rees

I am writing in support of the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.

I was enormously impressed with the knowledge and detail contained within the Neighbourhood Plan which supports the conclusions reached.

I sincerely hope the recommendations within the plan are taken on board by Cheshire West and Chester Council.
It seems quite obvious to me that the various development proposals being put forward by land owners and developers on land surrounding Christleton and Littleton are at odds with the Neighbourhood Plan.

Hundreds if not thousands of houses have already been built in Chester (Huntinton and Wrexham Road) all of which have not been supported by the necessary infrastructure and services to accommodate the extra traffic and population.

Comment

Representation ID: 17115

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Mike and Gill Jenkins

As a Littleton resident, I support the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood Plan (v31). It protects the character of our village, manages development responsibly, and reflects what our community wants for the future.

Comment

Representation ID: 17116

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Christopher Townsend

As a homeowner in the village of Christleton, I write to express that my family and I strongly support the ‘Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan’ (attached), believing it represents a carefully researched, evidence-based and proportionate framework for managing future development across the parish. The Plan has been prepared following extensive community engagement and reflects the clear aspirations of local residents to ensure that future growth is sustainable, appropriately scaled and respectful of the distinctive character of both villages. In my view, the Plan successfully balances the need for new housing with the equally important requirement to protect the qualities that make Christleton and Littleton attractive places to live, including their heritage, landscape setting, village identity and strong sense of community. The policies are locally specific, justified by evidence and provide clear guidance that will assist decision-makers in securing high-quality development over the lifetime of the Plan.

I am particularly supportive of the Plan's commitment to safeguarding green gaps, local green spaces, wildlife corridors, heritage assets and the Shropshire Union Canal corridor. These features are not merely attractive amenities but form part of the essential environmental infrastructure that defines the character of the area and contributes significantly to residents' health, wellbeing and quality of life. The Plan recognises that once these assets are lost or fragmented they cannot easily be replaced. Its policies therefore provide a necessary and justified level of protection against incremental erosion of the rural setting and separation between settlements. By promoting biodiversity enhancement, habitat connectivity, sustainable drainage, protection of important views and sensitive design principles, the Plan is fully aligned with the wider objectives of sustainable development and environmental stewardship.

The Plan also demonstrates a realistic understanding of existing infrastructure constraints and the need for development to proceed in a manner that is both responsible and deliverable. The concerns identified regarding traffic congestion, road safety, air quality, wastewater capacity and the cumulative impacts of development are legitimate planning considerations that should be afforded significant weight. I particularly welcome the emphasis on high-quality design, energy-efficient homes, active travel, protection of public rights of way and measures that support climate resilience. Collectively, these policies will help ensure that future development contributes positively to the area rather than placing additional pressure on already stretched infrastructure. For these reasons, I urge the examiner and Cheshire West and Chester Council to give substantial weight to the Neighbourhood Plan and support its progression to referendum and eventual adoption as part of the statutory development plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 17117

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Dave Smith

I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap GG2.

My wife and I chose to move to Christleton because it is one of the most sought after and prestigious area’s in Cheshire where you have the unique charm of the village plus the rural aspect making you feel at one with nature which has a massive impact on mental health and wellbeing. Unlike many areas on the edge of Chester, Christleton has retained a distinct identity, with green spaces providing a clear sense of separation from neighbouring settlements. The attractive landscape, openness and heritage were all significant factors in our decision to move here.

I strongly support the designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are important community assets that contribute significantly to the character of the area, local biodiversity and the wellbeing of residents.

Many residents understood when purchasing their homes that the orchard and playing field would remain protected green spaces and that there would be community access to these areas. Indeed, management charges initially included provision relating to the orchard and playing field, reinforcing the expectation that these spaces would remain part of the community environment. It is therefore important that these areas continue to receive the highest level of protection through the Neighbourhood Plan.

I am very concerned that the orchard has already suffered the loss of trees within the walled garden. These orchard trees formed an important part of the site’s heritage, character and biodiversity value. I believe every effort should be made to reinstate them so that this important local asset can be restored and enjoyed by future generations.

In addition to supporting LGS1, I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play a vital role in preventing the gradual coalescence of settlements and maintaining the separate identities of these communities. Once open countryside is lost to development, the separation it provides cannot be reinstated.

Green Gap 2 it is a vital area of open countryside used daily by walking groups, dog walkers, children walking to school etc. and has a beneficial impact on mental health and wellbeing, being at one with nature. It also provides an important habitat and wildlife corridor for a range of species such as badgers, foxes, bats, rabbits, birds of prey and many species of garden birds, all of which contribute to the biodiversity and ecological value of the village. The loss or fragmentation of this green space would inevitably reduce the habitat available to wildlife and diminish one of the area’s valuable natural assets. In addition, it provides attractive views across open countryside. These green spaces are part of what makes Christleton such a desirable place to live.

There are also practical reasons why further large-scale development in this area would be inappropriate. Local roads are already heavily used and congestion is a growing concern for residents. Additional housing development would inevitably increase traffic levels and road safety for children walking to school, place further pressure on local infrastructure and contribute to worsening air quality in and around the village. The current Primary and Secondary schools in Christleton are already at full pupil capacity and would be unable to cope with further housing development. There are also very limited GP’s and Dentists within the area and further houses would put a massive strain on them as well as the Countess of Chester Hospital where corridor care is currently the norm.

I am totally convinced there is no need to sacrifice valued green spaces for additional large-scale housing development in this location. The protection of Green Gap 2 helps ensure that growth is balanced with the preservation of the landscape, environment and village character that residents value so highly.

The Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of local residents, and the protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is clearly one of those priorities. These areas contribute to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities.

For all of these reasons, I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and hope that these protections remain robustly defended in the future.

Comment

Representation ID: 17118

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Smith

I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap GG2.

My husband and I chose to move to Christleton because it is one of the most sought after and prestigious area’s in Cheshire where you have the unique charm of the village plus the rural aspect making you feel at one with nature which has a massive impact on mental health and wellbeing. Unlike many areas on the edge of Chester, Christleton has retained a distinct identity, with green spaces providing a clear sense of separation from neighbouring settlements. The attractive landscape, openness and heritage were all significant factors in our decision to move here.

I strongly support the designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are important community assets that contribute significantly to the character of the area, local biodiversity and the wellbeing of residents.

Many residents understood when purchasing their homes that the orchard and playing field would remain protected green spaces and that there would be community access to these areas. Indeed, management charges initially included provision relating to the orchard and playing field, reinforcing the expectation that these spaces would remain part of the community environment. It is therefore important that these areas continue to receive the highest level of protection through the Neighbourhood Plan.

I am very concerned that the orchard has already suffered the loss of trees within the walled garden. These orchard trees formed an important part of the site’s heritage, character and biodiversity value. I believe every effort should be made to reinstate them so that this important local asset can be restored and enjoyed by future generations.

In addition to supporting LGS1, I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play a vital role in preventing the gradual coalescence of settlements and maintaining the separate identities of these communities. Once open countryside is lost to development, the separation it provides cannot be reinstated.

Green Gap 2 it is a vital area of open countryside used daily by walking groups, dog walkers, children walking to school etc. and has a beneficial impact on mental health and wellbeing, being at one with nature. It also provides an important habitat and wildlife corridor for a range of species such as badgers, foxes, bats, rabbits, birds of prey and many species of garden birds, all of which contribute to the biodiversity and ecological value of the village. The loss or fragmentation of this green space would inevitably reduce the habitat available to wildlife and diminish one of the area’s valuable natural assets. In addition, it provides attractive views across open countryside. These green spaces are part of what makes Christleton such a desirable place to live.

There are also practical reasons why further large-scale development in this area would be inappropriate. Local roads are already heavily used and congestion is a growing concern for residents. Additional housing development would inevitably increase traffic levels and road safety for children walking to school, place further pressure on local infrastructure and contribute to worsening air quality in and around the village. The current Primary and Secondary schools in Christleton are already at full pupil capacity and would be unable to cope with further housing development. There are also very limited GP’s and Dentists within the area and further houses would put a massive strain on them as well as the Countess of Chester Hospital where corridor care is currently the norm.

I am totally convinced there is no need to sacrifice valued green spaces for additional large-scale housing development in this location. The protection of Green Gap 2 helps ensure that growth is balanced with the preservation of the landscape, environment and village character that residents value so highly.

The Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of local residents, and the protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is clearly one of those priorities. These areas contribute to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities.

For all of these reasons, I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and hope that these protections remain robustly defended in the future.

Comment

Representation ID: 17119

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Rachael Moore

I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my wholehearted support for the continued protection of Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.
My family and I chose to make Christleton our home because of its unique character, its sense of space, and its close connection to the surrounding countryside. In an area where many communities have gradually merged into the wider urban landscape, Christleton has retained something genuinely special: a distinct village identity, defined by its green spaces, open views, and separation from neighbouring settlements.
When we first visited the area, it was the landscape and environment that stood out immediately. The orchard, playing field, surrounding green spaces and open countryside were not simply attractive features; they were central to our decision to invest in a home and build our future here. They provide a sense of tranquillity, wellbeing and connection to nature that is increasingly rare and valuable. Without these defining characteristics, we may well have chosen to live elsewhere.
For this reason, I strongly support the designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are far more than undeveloped land. They are an integral part of the character, heritage and environmental value of Christleton. They provide important habitats for wildlife, contribute to biodiversity, enhance the visual landscape and offer residents opportunities to enjoy open space within their community.
Many residents purchased their homes with the clear understanding that the orchard and playing field would remain protected green spaces with community access. The fact that management charges originally included provision relating to these areas reinforced the expectation that they would continue to form part of the community's shared environment. Protecting these spaces through the Neighbourhood Plan is therefore not only justified in planning terms, but also reflects the reasonable expectations of those who have chosen to make their homes here.
I am also deeply concerned by the loss of trees within the orchard's historic walled garden. These trees were an important part of the site's character, heritage and ecological value. Their removal represents a loss to both the local environment and the wider community. I strongly believe that every effort should be made to restore and reinstate the orchard so that future generations can continue to enjoy and benefit from this important local asset.
I equally support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play a vital role in preserving the separate identities of these communities. Once development erodes these green gaps, the sense of distinction between settlements is lost forever. The countryside that separates communities cannot simply be recreated once it has been built upon.
The value of Green Gap 2 extends beyond preventing coalescence. It provides important habitats for wildlife, supports biodiversity, offers beautiful views across open countryside and creates opportunities for walking, exercise and informal recreation. These benefits have a direct impact on the quality of life enjoyed by local residents and are fundamental to what makes Christleton such a desirable and attractive place to live.
There are also significant practical concerns regarding further large-scale development in this area. Local roads are already heavily trafficked and congestion is an increasing issue for residents. Additional housing development would inevitably place greater pressure on infrastructure, increase traffic volumes, worsen air quality and further strain local services. Any potential benefits of development must be carefully weighed against these very real impacts on existing communities.
More fundamentally, I do not believe that valued green spaces such as these should be sacrificed unless there is an overwhelming and clearly demonstrated need. The protection of Green Gap 2 helps ensure that future growth is balanced and sustainable, while preserving the landscape, environment and village character that make Christleton such a special place.
The Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan represents the collective vision of local residents for the future of their community. The protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is clearly one of its most important objectives. These spaces are not empty land awaiting development; they are essential components of the area's identity, character and quality of life. They contribute to biodiversity, recreation, heritage, environmental sustainability and the strong sense of place that residents value so highly.
I therefore strongly urge that the protections afforded to Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 are maintained and robustly defended. Future generations should have the same opportunity to enjoy the open landscapes, green spaces and village character that attracted so many of us to Christleton in the first place.

Comment

Representation ID: 17120

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Neville Kite

I am writing to express my support for the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, and my firm belief that any developers should have to abide by all its recommendations. In particular no further erosion of the green belt should be allowed, and the already very busy traffic situation on the A41 (regular long queues, pollution, accidents) should not be exacerbated by additional adjacent large developments.

Comment

Representation ID: 17121

Received: 10/06/2026

Respondent: The Mersey Forest

We strongly support greater alignment between the Neighbourhood Plan and The Mersey Forest Plan and its accompanying Tree Atlas. We recommend: setting local tree cover targets, aspiring to the 3:30:300 principle for trees in settlements, and targeting tree planting and enhancing green infrastructure, public spaces, and rights of way to benefit climate resilience, biodiversity, health, air quality and flood management. Please refer to The Mersey Forest Plan, Tree Atlas, and Local Nature Recovery Strategy to guide planting, habitat enhancement and to enable funding opportunities through planning and partnership working. We have attached a pdf with detailed comments.

Comment

Representation ID: 17122

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Ann-Marie Asbridge

I am writing to express my very strong support for the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16), especially in protecting Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2.

My husband and I moved to Christleton in March 2025. We chose to move to Christleton because it is a village which has a unique character. Co-incidentally I met someone who was from Christleton six months before we moved, who said to me ‘you will love it. It is like living in the countryside’. This is true, and although we chose a new build we carefully checked and are aware that our property was built upon an old car park hence we progressed with the purchase knowing that the beautiful countryside was not ruined in the process of the build.

We love the fact that Christleton is a hugely historic village which has a clear sense of separation from the neighbouring villages. In fact, I do recall the Sunday Times article of 2024 voting Christleton as one of the prettiest villages in Chester. The article particularly pointed out the delightful rural setting. The setting will not interest any potential developers who are only interested in profits. Once the green space is gone it is gone for good. Once the animal habitats are destroyed they are destroyed for good. Once the air quality is destroyed there is no going back – and the air quality is poor (this can be checked by accessing the Christleton Parish Council’s Air Quality working group figures on the Parish website).

Protecting Green Gaps is such an important feature of the Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16) which I wholeheartedly support and I hope will be robustly defended by the Local Authority. This is what makes areas attractive to live in and helps maintain physical and mental wellbeing. Green Gap 2 provides a sense of happiness, contentment and a connection to nature for local residents and should absolutely not be built upon.

I would like to express my strong support for the orchard associated with the former Law College site as part of the Local Green Space LSG1(regulation 16). The planning application for the recently built houses in the Law College car park was approved with the condition that the walled garden, with the orchard, remaining an area for residents and the local community to use and the planning application also stated that the orchard would be a pleasant natural habitat for local flora and fauna. Rare fruit trees were unintentionally accidentally removed by the developers who have subsequently requested change to the plans to re-instate the orchard in a ‘planning discharge application’. The orchard forms part of Christleton’s historic identity and offers significant advantages for wildlife and biodiversity. It should be considered a prized landscape feature, and LGS1's protection of it acknowledges the community's significance in terms of planning. I wholeheartedly support this proposal to protect it.

Furthermore, I support the Neighbourhood Plan’s proposal to protect the Law College Playing field. This provides Christleton Hall with a unique backdrop. Perhaps more importantly, it has historically been used as a playing field and for other recreational uses for the local community. More importantly still it provides a




home for rabbits, badgers and many different flora and fauna. Without this the character of the hall and of part of Christleton with it’s beautiful setting is destroyed.

The route to Christleton is very congested and further traffic would make this far worse. The Christleton Parish Council Air Quality working group established:

‘From August through to November a Christleton volunteer has monitored air quality from the A51 through the centre of Christleton to the A41 using a handheld Plume device which measures Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2), 10micron particles(PM10) and 2.5micron particles(PM2.5). Although these Plume devices have indicated that NO2 concentrations are at or below the NO2 limit at all locations from the A41 to the A51 they have revealed that PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations are at or well above the PM10 and PM2.5 limits at peak times at four hotspots.
• The centre of the village
• The centre of the village down Pepper St, the A41 cycle path and across the Hamburger
• Littleton A51 junction to VX Golf Club
• Little Heath Road to the A51
All of these locations are routes to schools for schoolchildren’
These figures appear to be from a 2019 analysis and one can assume they will not have improved at all as traffic is likely to be more intensive rather than less. Hence, building anywhere in Christleton really does not make any sense at all and is both harmful to health and dangerous to pedestrians and to vehicles. I would therefore like to wholeheartedly support the Green Gap 2 and it’s protection in the Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16).
Public Health England promote the fact that good mental health impacts physical health: ‘Our mental health influences our physical health, as well as our capability to lead a healthy lifestyle and to manage and recover from physical health conditions.’ Green Gap 2 is a beautiful open space area that separates Christleton village from Littleton and has a public footpath running through it which provides a much enjoyed recreational space for locals who run and take a stroll through it which provides beauty and solace and a connection to nature hence supporting mental and physical well-being. It is a beautiful space and is again a habitat for local wildlife such as birds, rabbits, hares, badgers and foxes and much more flora and fauna. It must be protected as it is of great ecological value. It would be shameful to give this away to developers ruining the quality of life for future generations and removing wildlife habitats, whilst also increasing noxious fumes in the area due to the increased traffic this would inevitably create.

Comment

Representation ID: 17123

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Mark Read

I am writing to express my strong support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, particularly the policies relating to Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2.
When my family chose to purchase our home in Christleton, one of the factors that influenced our decision was the attractive setting of the development and its relationship with the surrounding green spaces. The orchard, playing fields and open countryside contributed significantly to the character of the area and gave the village a sense of openness that distinguished it from more urban parts of Chester. Had these features not formed part of the setting of the development, we may well have chosen to live elsewhere.
For this reason, I strongly support the designation of LGS1, including the former Law College orchard and playing fields. These spaces are important community assets, valued for their contribution to local character, biodiversity and wellbeing.
Many residents understood that the orchard and playing fields would remain protected community spaces. We were led to believe that there would be access to the orchard and playing fields, and the initial management charges included provision relating to these areas. This reinforced the expectation that they would remain part of the community environment and be safeguarded for future generations.
I am particularly concerned that orchard trees within the walled garden were felled in error. These trees formed part of the historic character of the site and provided important ecological benefits. I believe that efforts should be made to reinstate them so that the orchard can be restored as a valued local feature and wildlife habitat.
I also strongly support the protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play an essential role in maintaining the separate identities of these communities and preventing the gradual coalescence of settlements. Once these gaps are lost, they cannot realistically be recreated.
There are also practical considerations. Local roads are already heavily used, and congestion is a frequent concern for residents. Any significant increase in development would place additional pressure on transport infrastructure and could contribute to worsening air quality. While I recognise that housing needs must be addressed appropriately, I have not seen evidence that would justify the loss of these valued green spaces, particularly where the impact on village character and local infrastructure could be substantial.
The Neighbourhood Plan has been developed through considerable community engagement and reflects the priorities of local residents. The protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is central to preserving the landscape, biodiversity and sense of place that make Christleton such a desirable place to live.
I therefore urge the examining authorities to retain these important protections within the final Neighbourhood Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 17124

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Rebecca Mason

As a resident of Christleton, I would like to register my support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, particularly the policies protecting Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2.

Our decision to buy a home in Christleton was influenced by the distinctive character of the village and the surrounding open countryside. The presence of the orchard, playing fields and nearby green fields created an attractive environment that offered both a sense of community and a connection with nature. These qualities set Christleton apart and were important considerations in our decision to move here.

I strongly support the continued protection of the former Law College orchard and playing field through the LGS1 designation. These areas provide visual amenity, opportunities for informal recreation and valuable habitats for wildlife. They are also important elements of the setting and identity of this part of the village.

When purchasing our home, we understood that residents would have access to the orchard and playing field. Furthermore, the original management arrangements included contributions relating to these spaces. These factors contributed to the reasonable expectation that they would remain protected community assets and formed part of the overall appeal of the development.

I was disappointed to learn that orchard trees within the walled garden had been lost. The orchard is an important part of the site's heritage and biodiversity value, and I believe those trees should be reinstated wherever possible to restore this important landscape feature.

I also support the retention of Green Gap 2. The open land between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross helps preserve the individual identities of these communities and prevents the erosion of the village setting through incremental development. Protecting these gaps ensures that future generations can continue to enjoy the qualities that residents value today.

Residents are increasingly aware of pressures on local infrastructure, particularly the road network. Traffic congestion is already a regular feature of daily life, and additional large-scale development would inevitably increase demand on existing services. Although I appreciate the need to plan positively for future housing requirements, I have not seen evidence demonstrating that development affecting these particular green spaces is necessary or that the resulting harm to village character and community assets would be justified.

The Neighbourhood Plan represents a clear expression of local priorities following extensive consultation. The policies protecting LGS1 and Green Gap 2 recognise the importance of preserving those aspects of Christleton that residents cherish most: its village identity, green setting and strong sense of place.

I respectfully ask that these protections are maintained and that the policies supporting them remain robust within the final Neighbourhood Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 17125

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: Andrea Devaney

In addition to the comments in my original email, I would like to point out that

The original plans approved by Cheshire West and Chester Council included a protected Orchard on the College Park Estate, Christleton. The trees within the walled garden were felled by the developer by mistake. I feel strongly that this error should be rectified and the trees should be reinstated. It would appear the developer has no regard for the original plans approved by Cheshire West and Chester Council.

WE also strongly support the additional protection by the green gaps and particularly GG2(page 47) which maintains the separation between Christleton and Littleton and vicars cross - the green fields behind the Law College development. The roadways in the area are overloaded and heavily polluted; any development would increase this burden.

Comment

Representation ID: 17126

Received: 09/06/2026

Respondent: I M Jones

I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my support for the policies in the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood plan that protects local Green space LGS1 & Green Gap 2.

We chose Christleton as our retirement home because of its unique character as a Village surrounded by open countryside. The attractive landscape, openness and access to nature were all important factors in our decision to move here. After spotting it in’ The Times’ as one of the best places to live, we made the move from Herts.

We live in the grounds of the former Law College and fully support the designation of the Orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are important Community assets that contribute significantly to the character, local biodiversity and the well being of the residents. When we purchased our house, we were under the impression that the Orchard and playing field would remain protected green spaces and there would be community access. The Management charges originally included provision for the maintenance of those spaces reinforcing our expectation that these would remain part of our community. We were horrified to find out that the Orchard had been levelled by “mistake” by the Builders “ and we now understand there are plans for this site to be developed. The “field” at the front has already been fenced off too and it has stopped local families enjoying it for sport and recreation. We understand there is a “Badger set” on this field and the Developers have recently had to instal ” Badger Gates” after they fenced off the field!

It is therefore important that these areas continue to receive the highest level of protection through the Neighbourhood Plan. We strongly believe that the Orchard should be re-instated so that the whole Community can enjoy it as well as preserving it for future generations. Also that the “Field” is open for the Community (and the Badgers) to enjoy.

As well as supporting LGS1, I support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play a vital role in preventing the gradual coalescence of settlements and maintaining the separate identities of these communities. Once open countryside is lost to development, the separation it provides cannot realistically be recreated Green Gap 2 also delivers significant environmental and community benefits. It supports wildlife, provides attractive views across open countryside and offers opportunities for walking, exercise and informal recreation. These green spaces are part of what makes Christelton such a desirable place to live. Local roads are a nightmare and congestion is a growing concern for residents. Christelton Village is used as a “cut through” and getting to and from the A41 is a growing problem which is adding to further pressure on local infrastructure which contributes to poorer air quality in and around the Village.

Additional housing development would inevitably increase traffic levels, place further pressure on local infrastructure and contribute to worsening air quality. I do not believe there is a need to sacrifice valuable green spaces for additional large-scale developments. The protection of Green Gap 2 helps ensure that growth is balanced with the preservation of the landscape, environment and village character that residents value so highly.

In my view, the Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of local residents and the protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is clearly one of those priorities. These areas contribute to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities.

I wholeheartedly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood plan that protects Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and hope these protections remain robustly defended in the future. I urge you to accept the Neighbourhood Plan relating to LGS1 and Green Gap 2.

Comment

Representation ID: 17127

Received: 10/06/2026

Respondent: Mr Kevin Asbridge

I am writing to express my very strong support for the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16), especially in protecting Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2.

My wife and I moved to Christleton in March 2025. We chose to move to Christleton because it is a village which has a unique character and has not been over-developed and ruined as so many other villages have.

Although we chose a new build, the development was on the site of an old car park and beautiful countryside was not ruined in the process of the build.

We love the fact that Christleton is a hugely historic village which has a clear sense of separation from the neighbouring villages. In fact the Sunday Times article of 2024 voting Christleton as one of the prettiest villages in Chester. The article particularly pointed out the delightful rural setting. The setting will not interest any potential developers who are only interested in profits. Once the green space is gone it is gone for good. Once the animal habitats are destroyed they are destroyed for good.

Protecting Green Gaps is such an important feature of the Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16) which I wholeheartedly support and I hope will be robustly defended by the Local Authority. This is what makes areas attractive to live in and helps maintain physical and mental wellbeing.

Green Gap 2 and the extremely well used footpath that traverses it provide village residents and visitors alike opportunities to experience nature on a daily basis whilst enjoying exercise and is a vital resource which should absolutely not be built upon It also provides a clear differentiation between the villages of Littleton and Christleton.

I would also like to express my strong support for the orchard associated with the former Law College site as part of the Local Green Space LSG1(regulation 16). The planning application for the recently built houses in the Law College car park was approved with the condition that the walled garden, with the orchard, remaining an area for residents and the local community to use and the planning application also stated that the orchard would be a pleasant natural habitat for local flora and fauna. Rare fruit trees were unintentionally accidentally removed by the developers who have subsequently requested change to the plans to re-instate the orchard in a ‘planning discharge application’. The orchard forms part of Christleton’s historic identity and offers significant advantages for wildlife and biodiversity. It should be considered a prized landscape feature, and LGS1's protection of it acknowledges the community's significance in terms of planning. I wholeheartedly support this proposal to protect it.

Furthermore, I support the Neighbourhood Plan’s proposal to protect the Law College Playing field. This provides Christleton Hall with a unique backdrop. Perhaps more importantly, it has historically been used as a playing field and for other recreational uses for the local community. More importantly still it provides a home for rabbits, badgers and many different flora and fauna. Without this the character of the hall and of part of Christleton with it’s beautiful setting is destroyed.

The route to Christleton is very congested and further traffic would make this far worse. The Christleton Parish Council Air Quality working group established:

‘From August through to November a Christleton volunteer has monitored air quality from the A51 through the centre of Christleton to the A41 using a handheld Plume device which measures Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2), 10micron particles(PM10) and 2.5micron particles(PM2.5). Although these Plume devices have indicated that NO2 concentrations are at or below the NO2 limit at all locations from the A41 to the A51 they have revealed that PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations are at or well above the PM10 and PM2.5 limits at peak times at four hotspots.
• The centre of the village
• The centre of the village down Pepper St, the A41 cycle path and across the Hamburger
• Littleton A51 junction to VX Golf Club
• Little Heath Road to the A51

These figures appear to be from a 2019 analysis and one can assume they will not have improved at all as traffic is likely to be more intensive rather than less. Hence, building anywhere in Christleton really does not make any sense at all and is both harmful to health and dangerous to pedestrians and to vehicles. I would therefore like to wholeheartedly support the Green Gap 2 and it’s protection in the Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16).
Public Health England promote the fact that good mental health impacts physical health: ‘Our mental health influences our physical health, as well as our capability to lead a healthy lifestyle and to manage and recover from physical health conditions.’ Green Gap 2 is a beautiful open space area that separates Christleton village from Littleton and has a public footpath running through it which provides a much enjoyed recreational space for locals who run and take a stroll through it which provides beauty and solace and a connection to nature hence supporting mental and physical well-being. It is a beautiful space and is again a habitat for local wildlife such as birds, rabbits, hares, badgers and foxes and much more flora and fauna. It must be protected as it is of great ecological value. It would be shameful to give this away to developers ruining the quality of life for future generations and removing wildlife habitats, whilst also increasing noxious fumes in the area due to the increased traffic this would inevitably create.