Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17128
Received: 10/06/2026
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Jeff and Sue Kerridge
We fully support the comments in the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood plan (NP)V 31 2026 – 2042.
In particular, we would like to support the importance of retaining the LGS areas highlighted in the report, specifically LGS1 by the former Law College, Playing field & Orchard. The reasons for this are highlighted already in the report but just to reiterate our concern re. the air quality due to the land’s proximity to the A55 & A41. Also, the volume of traffic over the canal bridge onto Pepper Street which is used by children travelling to & from school, (usually walking or on bikes).
We would also like to see the orchard which was cut down “by accident” reinstated as this has not happened yet.
We also support the retention of the other existing LGS spaces in Christleton & Littleton as highlighted in the report and to keep Littleton and Christleton villages as distinct entities and not to be become contiguous.
We fully support the comments in the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood plan (NP)V 31 2026 – 2042.
In particular, we would like to support the importance of retaining the LGS areas highlighted in the report, specifically LGS1 by the former Law College, Playing field & Orchard. The reasons for this are highlighted already in the report but just to reiterate our concern re. the air quality due to the land’s proximity to the A55 & A41. Also, the volume of traffic over the canal bridge onto Pepper Street which is used by children travelling to & from school, (usually walking or on bikes).
We would also like to see the orchard which was cut down “by accident” reinstated as this has not happened yet.
We also support the retention of the other existing LGS spaces in Christleton & Littleton as highlighted in the report and to keep Littleton and Christleton villages as distinct entities and not to be become contiguous.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17129
Received: 10/06/2026
Respondent: Sarah Thorley
I writing in support of the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.
I have followed the development of the plan and support and agree with the plans and proposals within it
I writing in support of the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.
I have followed the development of the plan and support and agree with the plans and proposals within it
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17130
Received: 10/06/2026
Respondent: Marion Grant
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, particularly those which aim to protect GG2, The Orchard and Playing Fields (LGS1) of the former Law College campus.
Green Gap 2 (GG2) is a large open area which provides a natural separation between Christleton and Littleton, thereby preserving the distinctive village character of both villages which is so valued by residents.
Green Gap 2 supports wildlife, diverse flora and attractive walking routes away from the noise and pollution of the heavily congested roads in the immediate area.
Development of this land would reduce this valuable space as the footpaths and bridleways within Green Gap 2 will be lost or become less enjoyable to use.
The loss of this open space would:
• Be detrimental to the identity and character of both villages
• Result in the loss of diverse flora, wildlife habitat and tranquil walking routes enjoyed by the local community.
• Lead to poorer air quality and increased noise pollution due to higher levels of traffic through the already congested Christleton.
Local Green Space 1 (LGS1) is a vital green asset for our community. It brings neighbours and local residents together, supporting both physical and mental well being and helping to alleviate social isolation - an increasingly important issue in todays society.
It is also an important habitat for badgers, rabbits and other wildlife.
Unfortunately, public access to this space has been restricted through the erection of fencing and locked gates. The site should remain publicly accessible.
It is important that:
*This green area remains an accessible part of the community environment and is protected through the Neighbourhood Plan
Walled Garden /Orchard
When planning permission was granted for development in this area it was given on the condition that ancient apple trees would remain. Unfortunately these trees were removed. The site is now neglected and overgrown behind locked gates. It was intended to be an asset to be enjoyed by the community, it appears this valuable area is at risk of being lost.
In summary
The orchard trees should be reinstated and the area be enjoyed by the community and future generations, thereby preserving the site’s heritage.
By safeguarding these spaces in this Neighbourhood Plan we can help to ensure the character of the area, its open countryside and valuable green spaces are protected for now and the future.
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, particularly those which aim to protect GG2, The Orchard and Playing Fields (LGS1) of the former Law College campus.
Green Gap 2 (GG2) is a large open area which provides a natural separation between Christleton and Littleton, thereby preserving the distinctive village character of both villages which is so valued by residents.
Green Gap 2 supports wildlife, diverse flora and attractive walking routes away from the noise and pollution of the heavily congested roads in the immediate area.
Development of this land would reduce this valuable space as the footpaths and bridleways within Green Gap 2 will be lost or become less enjoyable to use.
The loss of this open space would:
• Be detrimental to the identity and character of both villages
• Result in the loss of diverse flora, wildlife habitat and tranquil walking routes enjoyed by the local community.
• Lead to poorer air quality and increased noise pollution due to higher levels of traffic through the already congested Christleton.
Local Green Space 1 (LGS1) is a vital green asset for our community. It brings neighbours and local residents together, supporting both physical and mental well being and helping to alleviate social isolation - an increasingly important issue in todays society.
It is also an important habitat for badgers, rabbits and other wildlife.
Unfortunately, public access to this space has been restricted through the erection of fencing and locked gates. The site should remain publicly accessible.
It is important that:
*This green area remains an accessible part of the community environment and is protected through the Neighbourhood Plan
Walled Garden /Orchard
When planning permission was granted for development in this area it was given on the condition that ancient apple trees would remain. Unfortunately these trees were removed. The site is now neglected and overgrown behind locked gates. It was intended to be an asset to be enjoyed by the community, it appears this valuable area is at risk of being lost.
In summary
The orchard trees should be reinstated and the area be enjoyed by the community and future generations, thereby preserving the site’s heritage.
By safeguarding these spaces in this Neighbourhood Plan we can help to ensure the character of the area, its open countryside and valuable green spaces are protected for now and the future.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17131
Received: 11/06/2026
Respondent: Bloor Homes North West
Agent: Lichfields
Please see attached letter of representation.
Bloor is concerned at both the timing of the Neighbourhood Plan, coming forward prior to the emerging Local Plan. The Neighbourhood Plan must to have regard to the likely content of the emerging Local Plan and to national policy, in particular the need to significantly boost the supply of housing land. Bloor additionally considers that a number of policies within the Plan do not meet the basic conditions, as detailed in the attached letter of representation.
Please see attached letter of representation.
Bloor is concerned at both the timing of the Neighbourhood Plan, coming forward prior to the emerging Local Plan. The Neighbourhood Plan must to have regard to the likely content of the emerging Local Plan and to national policy, in particular the need to significantly boost the supply of housing land. Bloor additionally considers that a number of policies within the Plan do not meet the basic conditions, as detailed in the attached letter of representation.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17132
Received: 11/06/2026
Respondent: SJ Bowden
Please take my comments into account:
I feel strong,y there should be green space around these villages so that we are not joined up to Chester, and everyone has room to walk and roam and enjoy the countryside- good fir everyone’s health.
Certainly any new homes built should be suitable for young adults or first time buyers and I believe we are only a few houses shirt if the requisite number we should have here.
The thought of yet more traffic spilling out onto the busy A41 is horrendous, in view of the long traffic jams we have frequently and the thundering great lorries which pass along it constantly. The idea of any houses built eg behind the Mercure hotel and before that, the builders of those houses coming onto the A41 really is a no-no.
The bus services here are very poor- none at all along the A41 to Chester- we have one small village shop, no post office any longer, no more room in the schools, still far too much traffic going right through the village particularly at certain times of day etc etc PLEASE keep our villages as villages, good for all .
Please take my comments into account:
I feel strong,y there should be green space around these villages so that we are not joined up to Chester, and everyone has room to walk and roam and enjoy the countryside- good fir everyone’s health.
Certainly any new homes built should be suitable for young adults or first time buyers and I believe we are only a few houses shirt if the requisite number we should have here.
The thought of yet more traffic spilling out onto the busy A41 is horrendous, in view of the long traffic jams we have frequently and the thundering great lorries which pass along it constantly. The idea of any houses built eg behind the Mercure hotel and before that, the builders of those houses coming onto the A41 really is a no-no.
The bus services here are very poor- none at all along the A41 to Chester- we have one small village shop, no post office any longer, no more room in the schools, still far too much traffic going right through the village particularly at certain times of day etc etc PLEASE keep our villages as villages, good for all .
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17133
Received: 11/06/2026
Respondent: Mr Steve Maskrey
I wish to record my full and unequivocal support for all aspects of the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.
Later this year my family will have lived in the parish of Christleton for 36 years and fully anticipate continuing to do so. We accept the need for additional accommodation particularly affordable housing for young families and individuals but this should be implemented in a manner sympathetic with the village and parish's existing older housing stock. Additionally this should be delivered away from floodplains and only if accompanied by adequate, future-proofed infrastructure; e.g. schooling, roads, water & sewerage, parking inc. EV charging, energy, fibre Internet etc.
I spent some time yesterday looking at the newer housing in Tarporley where there is broadly a good consistency with the core older properties of the village. This is what I hope Christleton and Littleton can achieve. What we must avoid, for example, is the poor, 'off-the peg', homes built on the former law college land.
I look forward to an acknowledgement of this email and, in due course, approval of the neighbourhood plan.
I wish to record my full and unequivocal support for all aspects of the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.
Later this year my family will have lived in the parish of Christleton for 36 years and fully anticipate continuing to do so. We accept the need for additional accommodation particularly affordable housing for young families and individuals but this should be implemented in a manner sympathetic with the village and parish's existing older housing stock. Additionally this should be delivered away from floodplains and only if accompanied by adequate, future-proofed infrastructure; e.g. schooling, roads, water & sewerage, parking inc. EV charging, energy, fibre Internet etc.
I spent some time yesterday looking at the newer housing in Tarporley where there is broadly a good consistency with the core older properties of the village. This is what I hope Christleton and Littleton can achieve. What we must avoid, for example, is the poor, 'off-the peg', homes built on the former law college land.
I look forward to an acknowledgement of this email and, in due course, approval of the neighbourhood plan.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17134
Received: 12/06/2026
Respondent: Ian Vidamour
I agree with everything in the report. Christleton and Littleton must be protected from urban sprawl, protect green spaces, any small new builds must respect our rural heritage. Nature must be put first and be protected. Local infrastructure is not up to any more development beyond recent builds. The roads, water infrastructure, health care, schools etc cannot cope with much more new housing. This area is one of the jewels of Cheshire and must be protected as such. Bring people back into Chester city centre through housing and use other brown field sites in Cheshire. Not the green belt!
I agree with everything in the report. Christleton and Littleton must be protected from urban sprawl, protect green spaces, any small new builds must respect our rural heritage. Nature must be put first and be protected. Local infrastructure is not up to any more development beyond recent builds. The roads, water infrastructure, health care, schools etc cannot cope with much more new housing. This area is one of the jewels of Cheshire and must be protected as such. Bring people back into Chester city centre through housing and use other brown field sites in Cheshire. Not the green belt!
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17135
Received: 11/06/2026
Respondent: Rachael Guest
As a resident of Christleton, I would like to register my strong support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, particularly the ongoing protection of Local Green Space 1 (the former Law College orchard and playing field) and the Green Gap designations.
The network of open spaces surrounding Christleton is fundamental to the village’s character and identity. These green areas help preserve the distinct nature of the settlement and prevent the gradual merging of Christleton with neighbouring communities such as Littleton and Vicars Cross. The sense of space and separation they provide is an important reason why the area remains such an attractive place to live.
I fully support the continued designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space 1. The site is a valued asset for local residents, offering accessible open space close to housing and providing opportunities for informal recreation, relaxation and enjoyment of the natural environment. It also makes an important contribution to the appearance and setting of the wider neighbourhood. The playing field is home to much wildlife including badgers and foxes, a family of foxes with 4 cubs were seen playing one evening last summer. The fact that it has been closed off with a fence and un- maintained is a real shame to the local residence. We were told this would remain an open space when purchasing the property and management chargers reflected this.
In addition, the orchard forms part of the historic setting of Christleton Hall and therefore has heritage significance. The loss of a number of trees within the walled garden has already diminished some of its landscape and ecological value. Replanting and restoring the orchard would help safeguard its long-term contribution to the character of the area while enhancing biodiversity and visual amenity.
I also strongly endorse the retention of Green Gap 2. The open land between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross plays a vital role in maintaining clear and recognisable boundaries between these communities. Development within this area would result in a permanent reduction in openness and would erode the individual identity of each settlement.
Beyond its role in preventing coalescence, the Green Gap delivers a range of wider benefits. It supports wildlife habitats, protects important local views and contributes to opportunities for walking and informal recreation. Despite being close to Chester, these open areas help retain the rural setting and distinctive character that residents value so highly.
My support for these policies is also informed by personal experience. The quality of the surrounding landscape and the availability of nearby green space were significant factors in my decision to live in Christleton. These features continue to be central to the village’s appeal and quality of life.
There are also practical reasons for maintaining these protections. Local roads already experience considerable traffic pressure, and further large-scale development would place additional demands on transport infrastructure, services and the local environment.
The Neighbourhood Plan reflects the clear wishes of many local residents to safeguard the landscapes that define the area. The protection of Local Green Space 1 and the Green Gap policies is essential if the character, environmental quality and separate identity of Christleton and Littleton are to be preserved for future generations.
For all of these reasons, I strongly support the continued protection of Local Green Space 1 and the Green Gap policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.
As a resident of Christleton, I would like to register my strong support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, particularly the ongoing protection of Local Green Space 1 (the former Law College orchard and playing field) and the Green Gap designations.
The network of open spaces surrounding Christleton is fundamental to the village’s character and identity. These green areas help preserve the distinct nature of the settlement and prevent the gradual merging of Christleton with neighbouring communities such as Littleton and Vicars Cross. The sense of space and separation they provide is an important reason why the area remains such an attractive place to live.
I fully support the continued designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space 1. The site is a valued asset for local residents, offering accessible open space close to housing and providing opportunities for informal recreation, relaxation and enjoyment of the natural environment. It also makes an important contribution to the appearance and setting of the wider neighbourhood. The playing field is home to much wildlife including badgers and foxes, a family of foxes with 4 cubs were seen playing one evening last summer. The fact that it has been closed off with a fence and un- maintained is a real shame to the local residence. We were told this would remain an open space when purchasing the property and management chargers reflected this.
In addition, the orchard forms part of the historic setting of Christleton Hall and therefore has heritage significance. The loss of a number of trees within the walled garden has already diminished some of its landscape and ecological value. Replanting and restoring the orchard would help safeguard its long-term contribution to the character of the area while enhancing biodiversity and visual amenity.
I also strongly endorse the retention of Green Gap 2. The open land between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross plays a vital role in maintaining clear and recognisable boundaries between these communities. Development within this area would result in a permanent reduction in openness and would erode the individual identity of each settlement.
Beyond its role in preventing coalescence, the Green Gap delivers a range of wider benefits. It supports wildlife habitats, protects important local views and contributes to opportunities for walking and informal recreation. Despite being close to Chester, these open areas help retain the rural setting and distinctive character that residents value so highly.
My support for these policies is also informed by personal experience. The quality of the surrounding landscape and the availability of nearby green space were significant factors in my decision to live in Christleton. These features continue to be central to the village’s appeal and quality of life.
There are also practical reasons for maintaining these protections. Local roads already experience considerable traffic pressure, and further large-scale development would place additional demands on transport infrastructure, services and the local environment.
The Neighbourhood Plan reflects the clear wishes of many local residents to safeguard the landscapes that define the area. The protection of Local Green Space 1 and the Green Gap policies is essential if the character, environmental quality and separate identity of Christleton and Littleton are to be preserved for future generations.
For all of these reasons, I strongly support the continued protection of Local Green Space 1 and the Green Gap policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17136
Received: 11/06/2026
Respondent: Mr James Guest
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, in particular the continued protection of Local Green Space 1 (the former Law College orchard and playing field) and the Green Gap policies.
The presence of open green space around Christleton is one of the defining characteristics of the village. It plays a key role in maintaining the village’s distinct identity and in preventing the gradual merging of Christleton, Littleton and surrounding areas. The sense of openness and separation provided by these landscapes is a significant factor in what makes the area an attractive place to live and why we chose to move to Christleton less than 2 years ago.
I strongly support the designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space 1. As a resident of the nearby development this area forms an important local amenity and contributes to the character and setting of the wider neighbourhood. It provides accessible open space close to homes, supports biodiversity and provides habitats for local wildlife.
The orchard also has heritage value as part of the historic setting of Christleton Hall. When we moved into the development we were made aware that the Orchard would remain a protected green space accessible to the community. Our original management charge scope also included provision related to both the Orchard and playing field, further reinforcing our expectation that these green spaces would be maintained.
I also strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open land between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross performs an essential function in maintaining the clear separation between settlements. Once this land is developed, the resulting loss of openness and identity would be irreversible. In addition to its role in preventing coalescence, the Green Gap provides wider benefits, including support for biodiversity, protection of valued landscape views, and opportunities for informal recreation. It contributes significantly to the rural character of the area despite its proximity to Chester.
There are also practical considerations which reinforce the need for protection. Local roads are already subject to significant traffic levels, and further large-scale development would place additional pressure on transport infrastructure and the wider environment.
The Neighbourhood Plan reflects the priorities of local residents in seeking to preserve these valued landscapes. The protection of Local Green Space 1 and the Green Gaps is central to maintaining the character, identity and environmental quality of Christleton and Littleton. For these reasons, I fully support the policies set out within the Neighbourhood Plan.
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan, in particular the continued protection of Local Green Space 1 (the former Law College orchard and playing field) and the Green Gap policies.
The presence of open green space around Christleton is one of the defining characteristics of the village. It plays a key role in maintaining the village’s distinct identity and in preventing the gradual merging of Christleton, Littleton and surrounding areas. The sense of openness and separation provided by these landscapes is a significant factor in what makes the area an attractive place to live and why we chose to move to Christleton less than 2 years ago.
I strongly support the designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space 1. As a resident of the nearby development this area forms an important local amenity and contributes to the character and setting of the wider neighbourhood. It provides accessible open space close to homes, supports biodiversity and provides habitats for local wildlife.
The orchard also has heritage value as part of the historic setting of Christleton Hall. When we moved into the development we were made aware that the Orchard would remain a protected green space accessible to the community. Our original management charge scope also included provision related to both the Orchard and playing field, further reinforcing our expectation that these green spaces would be maintained.
I also strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open land between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross performs an essential function in maintaining the clear separation between settlements. Once this land is developed, the resulting loss of openness and identity would be irreversible. In addition to its role in preventing coalescence, the Green Gap provides wider benefits, including support for biodiversity, protection of valued landscape views, and opportunities for informal recreation. It contributes significantly to the rural character of the area despite its proximity to Chester.
There are also practical considerations which reinforce the need for protection. Local roads are already subject to significant traffic levels, and further large-scale development would place additional pressure on transport infrastructure and the wider environment.
The Neighbourhood Plan reflects the priorities of local residents in seeking to preserve these valued landscapes. The protection of Local Green Space 1 and the Green Gaps is central to maintaining the character, identity and environmental quality of Christleton and Littleton. For these reasons, I fully support the policies set out within the Neighbourhood Plan.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17137
Received: 11/06/2026
Respondent: Mrs Sallie Maskrey
I am writing to confirm my support for the above neighbourhood plan
After living in the area for 36 years I have a keen interest in seeing how our community develops over the coming years. I concur with my husbands earlier letter and would add that I’m very impressed with the amount of research and input on such a contentious topic to make the village fit for future residents.
I am writing to confirm my support for the above neighbourhood plan
After living in the area for 36 years I have a keen interest in seeing how our community develops over the coming years. I concur with my husbands earlier letter and would add that I’m very impressed with the amount of research and input on such a contentious topic to make the village fit for future residents.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17138
Received: 12/06/2026
Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council
Please see attached comments from Cheshire West and Chester Council.
Please see attached comments from Cheshire West and Chester Council.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17139
Received: 13/06/2026
Respondent: Mrs Ann Watkins
The villages should not get bigger . Traffic is already a major problem through the area . , facilities are limited ie school provision. , bus services etc . The area is semi rural and provides recreation space for people.. Building would mean a continuous urban area linking the villages to Chester and bring with it more traffic and pollution to an area already suffering from some urban sprawl. Planners could well be advised to look at the garden suburbs in London ie Hampstead Garden Suburb which have remained unique ,tBuilding and development should not equal urban sprawl.
The villages should not get bigger . Traffic is already a major problem through the area . , facilities are limited ie school provision. , bus services etc . The area is semi rural and provides recreation space for people.. Building would mean a continuous urban area linking the villages to Chester and bring with it more traffic and pollution to an area already suffering from some urban sprawl. Planners could well be advised to look at the garden suburbs in London ie Hampstead Garden Suburb which have remained unique ,tBuilding and development should not equal urban sprawl.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17140
Received: 13/06/2026
Respondent: Dr Martin Thompson
This plan captures my concerns and aspiration for the Christleton area perfectly. It feels like the greenbelt and green spaces are under a war of attrition from developers and even ruthlessly annexed, contrary to prior agreements (Law College development). Very little extra housing is needed locally. Schools, doctors, roads and other infrastructure are already over-stretched. The fragility of our food supply chain makes it essential to support and encourage farmers, not build on farming land. A local builder acknowledged (off record) that including ‘affordable’ homes is a Trojan horse to facilitate planning consent. These later become unaffordable or vanish altogether.
This plan captures my concerns and aspiration for the Christleton area perfectly. It feels like the greenbelt and green spaces are under a war of attrition from developers and even ruthlessly annexed, contrary to prior agreements (Law College development). Very little extra housing is needed locally. Schools, doctors, roads and other infrastructure are already over-stretched. The fragility of our food supply chain makes it essential to support and encourage farmers, not build on farming land. A local builder acknowledged (off record) that including ‘affordable’ homes is a Trojan horse to facilitate planning consent. These later become unaffordable or vanish altogether.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17141
Received: 12/06/2026
Respondent: Anne Wilson
With reference to the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16), Policy GG4 – Land Separating Christleton from Waverton – and the associated planning application 25/03351/OUT for 32 dwellings on Green Belt land between Birch Trees and Tree Tops, Brown Heath Road, Christleton, Chester, I wish to submit my formal representation.
I have been a resident of [redacted], Christleton, for 17 years, and my property backs directly onto this land. I strongly support Policy GG4 and have submitted an objection to the above planning application. I would be grateful if you could review and take into account the comments I submitted on the Cheshire West and Chester planning applications website on 14th November 2025.
I would also like to highlight that this is not the first attempt to develop this Green Belt land. Two previous applications were submitted:
• 98/00846/OUT (28 September 1998) – REFUSED. The Local Planning Authority concluded that the proposed residential development would lead to further coalescence of Christleton and Waverton, harming the openness of the designated North Cheshire Green Belt. The development was deemed inappropriate within the Green Belt.
• 09/11614/OUT (22 October 2009) – WITHDRAWN following strong opposition to the proposal.
Given this history, I would welcome consideration of whether some form of legal mechanism could be introduced to prevent developers from repeatedly submitting speculative and profit motivated applications on protected Green Belt land after they have already been refused.
I also agree with the Christleton Green Belt Alliance that the Brownfield Land Register should be updated and prioritised to ensure development is directed towards suitable, primarily urban brownfield sites. This approach supports housing delivery in areas of highest need and close to existing employment, while protecting our valuable Green Belt for future generations and safeguarding the distinctive character of individual parishes.
Thank you for considering my representation. I respectfully request that my comments are taken into account as part of the examination process.
With reference to the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan (Regulation 16), Policy GG4 – Land Separating Christleton from Waverton – and the associated planning application 25/03351/OUT for 32 dwellings on Green Belt land between Birch Trees and Tree Tops, Brown Heath Road, Christleton, Chester, I wish to submit my formal representation.
I have been a resident of Greenfield Road, Christleton, for 17 years, and my property backs directly onto this land. I strongly support Policy GG4 and have submitted an objection to the above planning application. I would be grateful if you could review and take into account the comments I submitted on the Cheshire West and Chester planning applications website on 14th November 2025.
I would also like to highlight that this is not the first attempt to develop this Green Belt land. Two previous applications were submitted:
• 98/00846/OUT (28 September 1998) – REFUSED. The Local Planning Authority concluded that the proposed residential development would lead to further coalescence of Christleton and Waverton, harming the openness of the designated North Cheshire Green Belt. The development was deemed inappropriate within the Green Belt.
• 09/11614/OUT (22 October 2009) – WITHDRAWN following strong opposition to the proposal.
Given this history, I would welcome consideration of whether some form of legal mechanism could be introduced to prevent developers from repeatedly submitting speculative and profit motivated applications on protected Green Belt land after they have already been refused.
I also agree with the Christleton Green Belt Alliance that the Brownfield Land Register should be updated and prioritised to ensure development is directed towards suitable, primarily urban brownfield sites. This approach supports housing delivery in areas of highest need and close to existing employment, while protecting our valuable Green Belt for future generations and safeguarding the distinctive character of individual parishes.
Thank you for considering my representation. I respectfully request that my comments are taken into account as part of the examination process.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17142
Received: 12/06/2026
Respondent: Homes England
As a prescribed body and landowner within the wider Cheshire West and Chester area, we would firstly like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above consultation.
Homes England is the government’s housing and regeneration agency. We are charged with powering a step change in the delivery of homes, sustainable place-making and local economic growth across England. Our mission is to harness our expertise, funding, resources and influence to enable the delivery of high-quality, safe and sustainable homes and vibrant, inclusive communities. Through collaboration with the housing sector and local leaders, we will unlock housing and regeneration opportunities, transform the housing market and drive innovation for lasting impact.
Homes England does not wish to make any representations on the above consultation. We will however continue to engage with you as appropriate.
Please find attached Homes England's response in relation to the above consultation.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17143
Received: 12/06/2026
Respondent: Christleton and Littleton Parish Councils Neighbourhood Plan Working Group
On behalf of the Christleton and Littleton Parish Councils Neighbourhood Plan Working Group, please find attached our response to the Bridgemere representation.
I would be grateful if you could confirm safe receipt of this submission.
On behalf of the Christleton and Littleton Parish Councils Neighbourhood Plan Working Group, please find attached our response to the Bridgemere representation.
I would be grateful if you could confirm safe receipt of this submission.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17144
Received: 12/06/2026
Respondent: United Utilities plc
Please find attached response submitted on behalf of United Utilities Water Limited in respect of the above consultation.
Please find attached response submitted on behalf of United Utilities Water Limited in respect of the above consultation.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17145
Received: 15/06/2026
Respondent: Historic England
Thank you for consulting Historic England in relation to the above consultation. We are the Government’s statutory adviser on all matters relating to the historic environment in England. We are a non-departmental public body established under the National Heritage Act 1983 and sponsored by the DCMS. We champion and protect England’s historic places, providing expert advice to local planning authorities, developers, owners and communities to help ensure that our historic environment is properly understood, enjoyed and cared for.
Historic England made a number of comments in relation to the pre-submission draft plan, on 12 November 2025.
We are pleased that these have largely been taken into account and we have no further comments to make.
We welcome the content of the publication draft plan so far as it affects our interests. We do not wish to make comments in relation to this version of Neighbourhood Plan. To avoid any doubt, this does not reflect our obligation to provide further advice or potentially object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise as a result of the proposed neighbourhood plan, where we consider these would have an adverse effect on the historic environment.
Thank you once again for providing Historic England with the opportunity to comment. Please do keep us informed of any future progress on this plan.
Thank you for consulting Historic England, please find our response attached.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17146
Received: 13/06/2026
Respondent: Mr Cliff Bryant
As a resident of Christleton we endure poor air quality due to heavy congestion on the A41 and A51, noise pollution from the A41 & A55, increased problems exiting the village on to the A41 following the development of the law college for housing and complete grid lock within the village and egress onto the A51/A41 during school drop off and pick-up although I would not want to see the school moved from its current location!
Further loss of green space around, within and adjacent to Christleton and Littleton must not be allowed!
There is the opportunity to build a small number of houses to infill between existing but this would probably only add approximately 10-20 homes and each should only be a single dwelling.
Please do not let any further green space be lost.
As a resident of Christleton we endure poor air quality due to heavy congestion on the A41 and A51, noise pollution from the A41 & A55, increased problems exiting the village on to the A41 following the development of the law college for housing and complete grid lock within the village and egress onto the A51/A41 during school drop off and pick-up although I would not want to see the school moved from its current location!
Further loss of green space around, within and adjacent to Christleton and Littleton must not be allowed!
There is the opportunity to build a small number of houses to infill between existing but this would probably only add approximately 10-20 homes and each should only be a single dwelling.
Please do not let any further green space be lost.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17147
Received: 13/06/2026
Respondent: Des Hickie
I strongly agree with the thrust of the Green Gap statement, but am concerned that the sentences allowing potential derogations to the principle of no development create wiggle room for undesirable and unanticipated developments in future to be permitted. I have little doubt that developers will be eyeing these derogations as soon as the plan is approved. These derogations need to be far more narrowly defined or removed.
I strongly agree with the thrust of the Green Gap statement, but am concerned that the sentences allowing potential derogations to the principle of no development create wiggle room for undesirable and unanticipated developments in future to be permitted. I have little doubt that developers will be eyeing these derogations as soon as the plan is approved. These derogations need to be far more narrowly defined or removed.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17148
Received: 13/06/2026
Respondent: Mr Roger Croston
1. No urban sprawl. Strictly protect the greenbelt. Do not want to look like the USA.
2. No to giving planning permission to speculative purchasers of agricultural land by profit seeking builders who would destroy the greenbelt.
3. No further house building along or accessing the A41 which cannot cope with existing traffic as evidenced by long queues at times.
4. Keep green spaces and rural feel.
5. No to infill building on existing gardens split off from properties.
6. Maintain roads and pathways and fill in potholes immediately they form.
7. Improve cycle route along canal to Chester.
8. Protect nature.
1. No urban sprawl. Strictly protect the greenbelt. Do not want to look like the USA.
2. No to giving planning permission to speculative purchasers of agricultural land by profit seeking builders who would destroy the greenbelt.
3. No further house building along or accessing the A41 which cannot cope with existing traffic as evidenced by long queues at times.
4. Keep green spaces and rural feel.
5. No to infill building on existing gardens split off from properties.
6. Maintain roads and pathways and fill in potholes immediately they form.
7. Improve cycle route along canal to Chester.
8. Protect nature.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17149
Received: 14/06/2026
Respondent: Mrs H.D. Thompson
I fully support the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood Plan. Christleton and Littleton are traditional Cheshire villages with great character, and would lose this if they merge into suburbs of Chester. Ugly empty developments, like the ‘Wyldewoods’ are also ruining the character of the area. There is no proven need for many new houses in the area, and the greenbelt needs to be preserved. Excess traffic is already a major problem in Christleton village and especially on the A41. It is very dangerous for children travelling to the local schools. The schools are also oversubscribed, and local children can’t get places.
I fully support the Christleton & Littleton Neighbourhood Plan. Christleton and Littleton are traditional Cheshire villages with great character, and would lose this if they merge into suburbs of Chester. Ugly empty developments, like the ‘Wyldewoods’ are also ruining the character of the area. There is no proven need for many new houses in the area, and the greenbelt needs to be preserved. Excess traffic is already a major problem in Christleton village and especially on the A41. It is very dangerous for children travelling to the local schools. The schools are also oversubscribed, and local children can’t get places.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17150
Received: 14/06/2026
Respondent: Mr John Wilson
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2.
My family and I chose to make our home in Christleton because of its unique character as a village surrounded by open countryside. Unlike many areas on the edge of Chester, Christleton has retained a distinct identity, with green spaces providing a clear sense of separation from neighbouring settlements. The attractive landscape, openness and access to nature were all significant factors in our decision to move here.
I strongly support the designation of the former Chester Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are important community assets that contribute significantly to the character of the area, local biodiversity and the wellbeing of its residents. My family and I along with our neighbours all understood from Castle Green Homes Limited that when purchasing our home the orchard and playing field would remain protected green spaces and that there would be community access to these areas. Indeed, the estate management charges initially included provision relating to the orchard and playing field, reinforcing the expectation that these spaces would remain part of the community environment. It is therefore important that these areas continue to receive the highest level of protection through the Neighbourhood Plan. For my family and I, the presence of the orchard, playing field and surrounding open green spaces formed an important part of the appeal of the area when we chose to make Christleton our home. The attractive landscape setting, access to green space and sense of openness were all significant factors in our decision to purchase a property here. Had these features not formed part of the character and setting of the development, we may well have made a different decision. I am also concerned that the orchard has already suffered the loss of historically important apple trees within the walled garden. These orchard trees formed an important part of the site’s heritage, character and biodiversity value. I believe every effort should be made to reinstate them so that this important local asset can be restored and enjoyed by future generations.
In addition to supporting LGS1, I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play a vital role in maintaining the separate identities of these communities and provide a nature habitat and corridor to allow animals and birds to thrive. Once open countryside is lost to development, the separation it provided cannot be recreated. Green Gap 2 also delivers significant environmental and community benefits. It supports wildlife, provides attractive views across open countryside and offers opportunities for walking, exercise and informal recreation. These green spaces are part of what makes Christleton such a desirable place to live. There are also practical reasons why further large-scale development in this area would be inappropriate. Local roads are already heavily used and congestion is a growing concern for residents. Additional housing development would inevitably increase traffic levels, place further pressure on the limited local infrastructure and contribute to worsening noise and air quality in and around the village.
I do not believe there is a need to sacrifice valued green spaces for additional large-scale housing development in this location. The protection of Green Gap 2 helps ensure that growth is balanced with the preservation of the landscape, environment and village character that residents value so highly. The Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of the local residents, and the protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is clearly one of those priorities. These areas contribute to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities. For all of these reasons, I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and hope that these protections remain robustly defended in the future.
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2.
My family and I chose to make our home in Christleton because of its unique character as a village surrounded by open countryside. Unlike many areas on the edge of Chester, Christleton has retained a distinct identity, with green spaces providing a clear sense of separation from neighbouring settlements. The attractive landscape, openness and access to nature were all significant factors in our decision to move here.
I strongly support the designation of the former Chester Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are important community assets that contribute significantly to the character of the area, local biodiversity and the wellbeing of its residents. My family and I along with our neighbours all understood from Castle Green Homes Limited that when purchasing our home the orchard and playing field would remain protected green spaces and that there would be community access to these areas. Indeed, the estate management charges initially included provision relating to the orchard and playing field, reinforcing the expectation that these spaces would remain part of the community environment. It is therefore important that these areas continue to receive the highest level of protection through the Neighbourhood Plan. For my family and I, the presence of the orchard, playing field and surrounding open green spaces formed an important part of the appeal of the area when we chose to make Christleton our home. The attractive landscape setting, access to green space and sense of openness were all significant factors in our decision to purchase a property here. Had these features not formed part of the character and setting of the development, we may well have made a different decision. I am also concerned that the orchard has already suffered the loss of historically important apple trees within the walled garden. These orchard trees formed an important part of the site’s heritage, character and biodiversity value. I believe every effort should be made to reinstate them so that this important local asset can be restored and enjoyed by future generations.
In addition to supporting LGS1, I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play a vital role in maintaining the separate identities of these communities and provide a nature habitat and corridor to allow animals and birds to thrive. Once open countryside is lost to development, the separation it provided cannot be recreated. Green Gap 2 also delivers significant environmental and community benefits. It supports wildlife, provides attractive views across open countryside and offers opportunities for walking, exercise and informal recreation. These green spaces are part of what makes Christleton such a desirable place to live. There are also practical reasons why further large-scale development in this area would be inappropriate. Local roads are already heavily used and congestion is a growing concern for residents. Additional housing development would inevitably increase traffic levels, place further pressure on the limited local infrastructure and contribute to worsening noise and air quality in and around the village.
I do not believe there is a need to sacrifice valued green spaces for additional large-scale housing development in this location. The protection of Green Gap 2 helps ensure that growth is balanced with the preservation of the landscape, environment and village character that residents value so highly. The Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of the local residents, and the protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is clearly one of those priorities. These areas contribute to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities. For all of these reasons, I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and hope that these protections remain robustly defended in the future.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17151
Received: 14/06/2026
Respondent: M K Kingston
As a resident of Christleton for 30 years. It is a very sad situation that we have the to defend our lovely village from greedy development.. a village that has already become a bottleneck because of the rat run between the A41 and A51. This of course was caused by another lots of developers designing the Sainsbury’s roundabout which is now in a terrible state. Our children need fresh air not air that is bringing unhealthy fumes from terrible traffic congestion. Why ruin our lovely villages to meet the present government’s housing targets, especially as the developments only favour greedy developers. save our villages please…don’t make it any worse than it already is
As a resident of Christleton for 30 years. It is a very sad situation that we have the to defend our lovely village from greedy development.. a village that has already become a bottleneck because of the rat run between the A41 and A51. This of course was caused by another lots of developers designing the Sainsbury’s roundabout which is now in a terrible state. Our children need fresh air not air that is bringing unhealthy fumes from terrible traffic congestion. Why ruin our lovely villages to meet the present government’s housing targets, especially as the developments only favour greedy developers. save our villages please…don’t make it any worse than it already is
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17152
Received: 14/06/2026
Respondent: Mrs Alison Wilson
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2.
My family and I chose to make our home in Christleton because of its unique character as a village surrounded by open countryside. Unlike many areas on the edge of Chester, Christleton has retained a distinct identity, with green spaces providing a clear sense of separation from neighbouring settlements. The attractive landscape, openness and access to nature were all significant factors in our decision to move here.
I strongly support the designation of the former Chester Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are important community assets that contribute significantly to the character of the area, local biodiversity and the wellbeing of its residents. My family and I along with our neighbours allunderstood from Castle Green Homes Limited that when purchasing our home the orchard and playing field would remain protected green spaces and that there would be community access to these areas. Indeed, the estate management charges initially included provision relating to the orchard and playing field, reinforcing the expectation that these spaces would remain part of the community environment. It is therefore important that these areas continue to receive the highest level of protection through the Neighbourhood Plan. For my familyand I, the presence of the orchard, playing field and surrounding open green spaces formed an important part of the appeal of the area when we chose to make Christleton our home. The attractive landscape setting, access to green space and sense of openness were all significant factors in our decision to purchase a property here. Had these features not formed part of the character and setting of the development, we may well have made a different decision. I am also concerned that the orchard has already suffered the loss ofhistorically important apple trees within the walled garden. These orchard trees formed an important part of the site’s heritage, character and biodiversity value. I believe every effort should be made to reinstate them so that this important local asset can be restored and enjoyed by future generations.
In addition to supporting LGS1, I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play a vital role in maintaining the separate identities of these communities and provide a nature habitat and corridor to allow animals and birds to thrive. Once open countryside is lost to development, the separation it provided cannot be recreated. Green Gap 2 also delivers significant environmental and community benefits. It supports wildlife, provides attractive views across open countryside and offers opportunities for walking, exercise and informal recreation. These green spaces are part of what makes Christleton such a desirable place to live. There are also practical reasons why further large-scale development in this area would be inappropriate. Local roads are already heavily used and congestion is a growing concern for residents. Additional housing development would inevitably increase traffic levels, place further pressure on the limited local infrastructure and contribute to worsening noise and air quality in and around the village.
I do not believe there is a need to sacrifice valued green spaces for additional large-scale housing development in this location. The protection of Green Gap 2 helps ensure that growth is balanced with the preservation of the landscape, environment and village character that residents value so highly. The Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of the local residents, and the protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is clearly one of those priorities. These areas contribute to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities. For all of these reasons, I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and hope that these protections remain robustly defended in the future.
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2.
My family and I chose to make our home in Christleton because of its unique character as a village surrounded by open countryside. Unlike many areas on the edge of Chester, Christleton has retained a distinct identity, with green spaces providing a clear sense of separation from neighbouring settlements. The attractive landscape, openness and access to nature were all significant factors in our decision to move here.
I strongly support the designation of the former Chester Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are important community assets that contribute significantly to the character of the area, local biodiversity and the wellbeing of its residents. My family and I along with our neighbours allunderstood from Castle Green Homes Limited that when purchasing our home the orchard and playing field would remain protected green spaces and that there would be community access to these areas. Indeed, the estate management charges initially included provision relating to the orchard and playing field, reinforcing the expectation that these spaces would remain part of the community environment. It is therefore important that these areas continue to receive the highest level of protection through the Neighbourhood Plan. For my familyand I, the presence of the orchard, playing field and surrounding open green spaces formed an important part of the appeal of the area when we chose to make Christleton our home. The attractive landscape setting, access to green space and sense of openness were all significant factors in our decision to purchase a property here. Had these features not formed part of the character and setting of the development, we may well have made a different decision. I am also concerned that the orchard has already suffered the loss ofhistorically important apple trees within the walled garden. These orchard trees formed an important part of the site’s heritage, character and biodiversity value. I believe every effort should be made to reinstate them so that this important local asset can be restored and enjoyed by future generations.
In addition to supporting LGS1, I strongly support the continued protection of Green Gap 2. The open fields between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross play a vital role in maintaining the separate identities of these communities and provide a nature habitat and corridor to allow animals and birds to thrive. Once open countryside is lost to development, the separation it provided cannot be recreated. Green Gap 2 also delivers significant environmental and community benefits. It supports wildlife, provides attractive views across open countryside and offers opportunities for walking, exercise and informal recreation. These green spaces are part of what makes Christleton such a desirable place to live. There are also practical reasons why further large-scale development in this area would be inappropriate. Local roads are already heavily used and congestion is a growing concern for residents. Additional housing development would inevitably increase traffic levels, place further pressure on the limited local infrastructure and contribute to worsening noise and air quality in and around the village.
I do not believe there is a need to sacrifice valued green spaces for additional large-scale housing development in this location. The protection of Green Gap 2 helps ensure that growth is balanced with the preservation of the landscape, environment and village character that residents value so highly. The Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of the local residents, and the protection of LGS1 and Green Gap 2 is clearly one of those priorities. These areas contribute to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities. For all of these reasons, I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and hope that these protections remain robustly defended in the future.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17153
Received: 14/06/2026
Respondent: Sophie Wilcox
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 (page 52) and Green Gap 2 (page 47).
My husband and I chose to make our home in Christleton because of its unique character as a village surrounded by open countryside. The attractive landscape, access to green spaces, and clear separation from neighbouring settlements were all significant factors in our decision to move here. These qualities contribute greatly to residents' wellbeing and are central to the identity of the village.
I strongly support the designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are valuable community assets that contribute to the character of the area, local biodiversity, recreation opportunities, and the overall quality of life enjoyed by residents.
When purchasing our property, we were informed that residents would have free access to both the orchard and the playing fields. This understanding formed an important part of the appeal of the development and influenced our decision to purchase a home here. Furthermore, the management charges associated with owning our property initially included a component relating to the orchard and playing field, reinforcing the expectation that these areas would remain protected community green spaces available for residents' enjoyment.
I am also concerned that the orchard has already suffered the loss of the orchard trees within the walled garden, which were felled by mistake. These trees were an important feature of the site's heritage, character, and biodiversity. I strongly believe that they should be reinstated so that the orchard can be restored to its intended form and continue to provide environmental and community benefits for residents of the development, the village and for future generations.
In addition to supporting LGS1, I strongly support the additional protection provided by the Green Gaps, particularly Green Gap 2 (GG2) on page 47. The green fields behind the Law College development play a vital role in maintaining the separation between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross. This open countryside helps preserve the distinct identities of these communities and prevents the gradual coalescence of settlements. Once such green spaces are lost to development, the separation and character they provide cannot realistically be recreated.
These open fields also deliver significant environmental benefits, supporting wildlife habitats, providing attractive views, and contributing to the rural setting that makes Christleton such a desirable place to live.
There are also compelling practical reasons why further large-scale housing development in this area would be inappropriate. The local road network is already overloaded, with congestion affecting residents on a daily basis. Additional development would inevitably place even greater pressure on roads and local infrastructure. Increased traffic would also worsen air pollution, which is already a significant concern in the area.
Furthermore, there appears to be no compelling need for substantial additional housing development in this location. There is no corresponding level of local job growth that would justify large-scale expansion, and it is therefore difficult to see why valued green spaces should be sacrificed unnecessarily.
The Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of local residents, and the protection of LGS1 and GG2 is clearly among those priorities. These areas contribute significantly to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities, environmental quality, and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities.
For all of these reasons, I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and urge that these protections remain robustly defended in the future.
I am writing as a resident of Christleton to express my strong support for the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 (page 52) and Green Gap 2 (page 47).
My husband and I chose to make our home in Christleton because of its unique character as a village surrounded by open countryside. The attractive landscape, access to green spaces, and clear separation from neighbouring settlements were all significant factors in our decision to move here. These qualities contribute greatly to residents' wellbeing and are central to the identity of the village.
I strongly support the designation of the former Law College orchard and playing field as Local Green Space LGS1. These areas are valuable community assets that contribute to the character of the area, local biodiversity, recreation opportunities, and the overall quality of life enjoyed by residents.
When purchasing our property, we were informed that residents would have free access to both the orchard and the playing fields. This understanding formed an important part of the appeal of the development and influenced our decision to purchase a home here. Furthermore, the management charges associated with owning our property initially included a component relating to the orchard and playing field, reinforcing the expectation that these areas would remain protected community green spaces available for residents' enjoyment.
I am also concerned that the orchard has already suffered the loss of the orchard trees within the walled garden, which were felled by mistake. These trees were an important feature of the site's heritage, character, and biodiversity. I strongly believe that they should be reinstated so that the orchard can be restored to its intended form and continue to provide environmental and community benefits for residents of the development, the village and for future generations.
In addition to supporting LGS1, I strongly support the additional protection provided by the Green Gaps, particularly Green Gap 2 (GG2) on page 47. The green fields behind the Law College development play a vital role in maintaining the separation between Christleton, Littleton and Vicars Cross. This open countryside helps preserve the distinct identities of these communities and prevents the gradual coalescence of settlements. Once such green spaces are lost to development, the separation and character they provide cannot realistically be recreated.
These open fields also deliver significant environmental benefits, supporting wildlife habitats, providing attractive views, and contributing to the rural setting that makes Christleton such a desirable place to live.
There are also compelling practical reasons why further large-scale housing development in this area would be inappropriate. The local road network is already overloaded, with congestion affecting residents on a daily basis. Additional development would inevitably place even greater pressure on roads and local infrastructure. Increased traffic would also worsen air pollution, which is already a significant concern in the area.
Furthermore, there appears to be no compelling need for substantial additional housing development in this location. There is no corresponding level of local job growth that would justify large-scale expansion, and it is therefore difficult to see why valued green spaces should be sacrificed unnecessarily.
The Neighbourhood Plan has been carefully developed to reflect the priorities of local residents, and the protection of LGS1 and GG2 is clearly among those priorities. These areas contribute significantly to the landscape, biodiversity, recreational opportunities, environmental quality, and sense of place that make Christleton and Littleton distinctive communities.
For all of these reasons, I strongly support the policies within the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan that protect Local Green Space LGS1 and Green Gap 2 and urge that these protections remain robustly defended in the future.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17154
Received: 14/06/2026
Respondent: N Smith
Fully support
Fully support
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17155
Received: 15/06/2026
Respondent: Mr Robin Craig
I support the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan. The protection of the Green Gaps, in particular GC1, GC2 and GC4, is essential to maintain the character and countryside setting of the villages. Without these, the villages would become engulfed by the sprawl of the City of Chester and vital, well used walking, running and cycling amenities would be lost forever.
I support the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan. The protection of the Green Gaps, in particular GC1, GC2 and GC4, is essential to maintain the character and countryside setting of the villages. Without these, the villages would become engulfed by the sprawl of the City of Chester and vital, well used walking, running and cycling amenities would be lost forever.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17156
Received: 15/06/2026
Respondent: Natural England
Please find Natural England’s response in relation to the above-mentioned consultation attached.
Please find Natural England’s response in relation to the above-mentioned consultation attached.
Comment
Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 consultation
Representation ID: 17157
Received: 15/06/2026
Respondent: Helen Duffy
I am emailing in support of the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood plan.
Firstly I would like to thank all involved for the time and effort put in to this very comprehensive plan.
I think that it is essential to maintain the character of the two villages and to protect the green belt and open green spaces to prevent urban sprawl and the destruction of natural habitats.
There are many important policies in this plan including improvements to tackle the ongoing problem with traffic and excessive speed throughout the villages.
I am emailing in support of the Christleton and Littleton Neighbourhood plan.
Firstly I would like to thank all involved for the time and effort put in to this very comprehensive plan.
I think that it is essential to maintain the character of the two villages and to protect the green belt and open green spaces to prevent urban sprawl and the destruction of natural habitats.
There are many important policies in this plan including improvements to tackle the ongoing problem with traffic and excessive speed throughout the villages.