Comment

Representation ID: 17211

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: Mr Allan Topp

As confirmed in my earlier email, my wife Pauline and I own land east of Harrison Close, Tattenhall, which we purchased in 1994 and sits directly alongside the existing houses on Harrison Close, from which it is separated by a belt of mature oak trees that we would wish to see retained.
To be clear, we are not at this stage asking for our land to be allocated for development in the Neighbourhood Plan. We understand that the Plan focuses housing growth on the Frog Lane site and we are not wishing to change that. We are submitting that our land could, in future, be considered for a development complimentary to the village needs.
We would therefore ask that the Plan is modified slightly to allow small-scale housing development on suitable land close to the village to be considered on its merits, and that the Plan includes a mechanism to review housing policies if circumstances change — for example if the Frog Lane site does not come forward as quickly as expected.
We are not objecting to the Plan and are happy for it to proceed. We simply ask that it allows the option for land like ours to be looked at in the future.

Comment

Representation ID: 17212

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council

Please find attached our formal comments on Tattenhall and District Neighbourhood Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 17213

Received: 29/07/2026

Respondent: Heatons

Please see attached Cover Letter.

Comment

Representation ID: 17214

Received: 30/07/2026

Respondent: Mr Robert Radcliff

The Plan as drafted is fundamentally flawed and should be revisited from scratch. Individual weaknesses exist in the following areas:
Radical change of policy
Scale
Traffic congestion
Infrastructure
Housing density
Open spaces
Environmental degradation
Reliance on landowner / developer(s)
These elements are explored in the submitted full comments, together with suggested actions.

Comment

Representation ID: 17215

Received: 30/07/2026

Respondent: Bolesworth Estate Co Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Planning Group Ltd

We have been instructed on behalf of our client, The Bolesworth Estate, to submit the attached Representations to the Regulation 16 consultation of the Tattenhall Neighbourhood Plan.

Appendix 4 is also attached [separately] – as the plans seem to have lost their colour whilst PDFing.

Comment

Representation ID: 17216

Received: 30/07/2026

Respondent: Gladman Developments Ltd

Please see Gladman’s attached representation to the Tattenhall Neighbourhood Plan Review Regulation 16 consultation.

Comment

Representation ID: 17217

Received: 30/07/2026

Respondent: United Utilities plc

Please find attached response submitted on behalf of United Utilities Water Limited regarding the above matter.

Comment

Representation ID: 17218

Received: 30/07/2026

Respondent: Broxton and District Parish Council

Broxton and District Parish Council has resolved that the following comments are submitted in relation to the Tattenhall Neighbourhood Plan:-

That speed reductions are required on the A41.

Please would you ensure that these comments are considered during the review.

Comment

Representation ID: 17219

Received: 31/07/2026

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Limited

Agent: Lichfields

In relation to the Tattenhall and District Modified Neighbourhood Plan Regulation 16 consultation, please see attached representations submitted on behalf of our client Taylor Wimpey UK Limited.