Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 4326

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4555
We do not agree.  The approach does not take into account the individual characteristics of the Neston and Parkgate area. There is, for instance, no mention of either the Parkgate or the Neston Conservation area as a planning consideration.   Any proposed development will impact the visual coherence of the area, including its architectural style, historical significance and overall character. It will also result in a threat to the heritage value of the area.    The Parkgate Society regards preservation of the Green Belt as an overriding priority and under no circumstances would we be in agreement to development on the greenbelt in the local area.  Depending on which Spatial strategy options is accepted, the proposals for a significant number of new houses to be built around the area would be bound to alter the ‘rural’ nature of the area and to impact on the relevant townscapes.   Equally the approach does not take into account the impact of any developments on the environment and pollution, transportation, and on local amenities and services Impact on the environment The area lies within a floodplain and is at risk of environmental degradation. The lower part of the area (adjacent to the marsh) already experiences flooding issues during winter months – any further disturbance to ground water that drains to that area is only likely to increase flood risks.  There would have to be massive investment made for increased levels of sewerage: the River Dee already has above average levels of sewerage dumped into the river from Quayside, and it is well documented that the sewerage treatment works on the Old Quay (upstream of Parkgate) are at over capacity. Impact on traffic and transportation Any proposed development will increase congestion and affect local road networks, (roads which are at present not well maintained), and will create safety hazards for pedestrians and cyclists. The Parade in Parkgate is already very congested and Leighton Road is not suitable to take any more traffic. There is already insufficient provision for parking or public transportation. Despite Neston having its own train station, the service is very limited in terms of direct destinations and the surrounding infrastructure is not suitable for increased traffic or park and ride facilities. There are limited opportunities for local employment on the Clayhill industrial Estate, but there is currently no train service to Deeside Industrial Park or Cheshire Oaks which are large local employers. Impact on local amenities and services Any large-scale development will have a detrimental impact on local amenities and services. Neston High School and the local primary schools are already at maximum capacity. There will be an increased strain on infrastructure, including healthcare facilities, and other public services. Any development will affect the availability of essential amenities, such as shops, parks, or recreational spaces .

Comment

Representation ID: 4327

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4556
We suggest specialist student accommodation should be encouraged on the Leahurst campus of the University of Liverpool

Comment

Representation ID: 4328

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4557
We suggest specialist student accommodation should be encouraged on the Leahurst campus of the University of Liverpool

Comment

Representation ID: 4329

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4558
We agree with the proposals on affordable housing

Comment

Representation ID: 4330

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4559
we agree

Comment

Representation ID: 4331

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4560
we agree

Comment

Representation ID: 4332

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4561
We consider that the present order of provision of open space in new developments is appropriate and more flexibility would be detrimental.

Comment

Representation ID: 4333

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4562
we agree

Comment

Representation ID: 4334

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4563
We agree. We are particularly concerned that drainage issues are considered in an area such as the proposed NEP01 since we know that surface run off already significantly floods the Wirral Way every winter and properties at the bottom of Boathouse Lane sometimes. Furthermore for all of Neston and Parkgate we are aware that the sewage works on Old Quay Lane is already at capacity sewage “overspill” occurs frequently on to the Dee marshes (a Special Area of Conservation, a Special Protection Area and an area of Special Scientific Interest) frequently every year. For example, at the Marshlands Road site there were 24 sewage dumps for a total of 308 hours in 2024. The impact of these issues on the Dee Estuary Special Protection area and its biodiversity was recognised by CWAC in its letter to the Secretary of State of 7/10/2022. The supply of fresh water is near capacity

Comment

Representation ID: 4335

Received: 26/08/2025

Respondent: Parkgate Society

I&O_4564
We believe it is self-evident that water supply and waste water/sewage capacity issues must be dealt with BEFORE significant additional housing development is allowed.