Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 9684

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10180
Yes – the guidance in NPPF and NPPG – especially in relation to Grey Belt


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9685

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10181
Variation of Option B is preferred – see our Option D below [attached]


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9686

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10182
Yes : as follows OPTION D : “Sustainable settlements & Infrastructure solutions” Delivered through : Green Belt release, delivering growth in sustainable settlements with supporting infrastructure with proportionate growth based on scale and status  Our OPTION D would deliver the following spatial distribution and a total of c. 29,025 units: City & Sub Regional Centre : Chester At least 7,000 Principal Town : Ellesmere Port At least 5,000 Principal Town : Northwich At least 4,000 Principal Town : Winsford At least 3,000 Principal Town : Middlewich No figure defined Market Town : Neston & Parkgate At least 1,500 Market Town : Frodsham At least 1,000 Strategic Service Centres (4) : Helsby, Cuddington & Sandiway, Tarporley, Malpas Up to 750 in each = 3,000 Key Service Centres (5) : Kelsall, Tattenhall, Tarvin, Farndon and Christleton Up to 500 in each = 2,500 Local Service Centres (27) : Antrobus, Ashton Hayes, Aldford, Childer Thornton, Comberbach, Crowton, Delamere, Dodleston, Duddon, Eaton, Eccleston, Elton, Great Barrow, Great Budworth, Guilden Sutton, Higher Wincham, Kingsley, Little Budworth, Mickle Trafford, Moulton, No Mans Heath, Norley, Saughall, Tilston, Utkinton, Waverton and Willaston Up to 75 in each = 2,025


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9687

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10183
Yes – redevelopment of brownfield (PDL) sites, small scale housing expansion, housing infill, community led housing, exception housing


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9688

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10184
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9689

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10185
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9690

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10186
Yes – Our OPTION D is most closely aligned with Option B, albeit it is based upon a slightly amended Settlement Hierarchy and spatial distribution of housing growth as set out above, which would total 28,250 dwellings.


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9691

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10187
No


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9693

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10189
Yes


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9694

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10190
Willing landowners / promoters and site deliverability


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.