Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 9695

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10191
CH01 is the best and most logical fit for the future growth of Chester CH03 is constrained by floodrisk and biodiversity to its eastern half and by acoustic impacts and highway impact issues CH04 is a poor strategic option and suffers from poor connectivity/accessibility onto the network


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9696

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10192
CH01 is the best and most logical fit for the future growth of Chester CH03 is constrained by floodrisk and biodiversity to its eastern half and by acoustic impacts and highway impact issues CH04 is a poor strategic option and suffers from poor connectivity/accessibility onto the network


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9697

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10193
CH01 is the best and most logical fit for the future growth of Chester CH03 is constrained by floodrisk and biodiversity to its eastern half and by acoustic impacts and highway impact issues CH04 is a poor strategic option and suffers from poor connectivity/accessibility onto the network


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9698

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10194
EP01 (the westernmost parcels) appear to be the best option and fit for strategic growth, benefitting from dual frontages onto both the A5117 and A41, acknowledging there are floodrisk constraints further to the east and the whole area will have to address utility infrastructure  EP02 is constrained by access consideration onto the A5117 without major remodelling  EP03 could offer potential but would reduce the strategic gap between Ellesmere Port and Eastham


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9699

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10195
The options for Northwich all have something wrong with them; for instance: NOR1 at Barnton/Anderton feels as though it would need a strategic link road to service it NOR2 at Wincham suffers from poor accessibility and would lead to a remote and detached location without community infrastructure support NOR10, 11 and 12 at Weaverham may offer the best fit but this is less an expansion of Northwich and more about the re-definition of Weaverham without supporting infrastructure NOR6 will change the character of Davenham, whilst not benefitting from great access NOR7, 8 and 9 may offer the best option for Northwich (aka Hartford)


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9700

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10196
The options for Northwich all have something wrong with them; for instance: NOR1 at Barnton/Anderton feels as though it would need a strategic link road to service it NOR2 at Wincham suffers from poor accessibility and would lead to a remote and detached location without community infrastructure support NOR10, 11 and 12 at Weaverham may offer the best fit but this is less an expansion of Northwich and more about the re-definition of Weaverham without supporting infrastructure NOR6 will change the character of Davenham, whilst not benefitting from great access NOR7, 8 and 9 may offer the best option for Northwich (aka Hartford)


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9701

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10197
The options for Northwich all have something wrong with them; for instance: NOR1 at Barnton/Anderton feels as though it would need a strategic link road to service it NOR2 at Wincham suffers from poor accessibility and would lead to a remote and detached location without community infrastructure support NOR10, 11 and 12 at Weaverham may offer the best fit but this is less an expansion of Northwich and more about the re-definition of Weaverham without supporting infrastructure NOR6 will change the character of Davenham, whilst not benefitting from great access NOR7, 8 and 9 may offer the best option for Northwich (aka Hartford)


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9702

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10198
WIN 3, 4 and 7 may be more suitable locations WIN5 suffers from poor access


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9703

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10199
All options would lead to significant highway impacts and it does beg the question about whether the Warrington Road can sustain potential growth that relies upon it Given the proximity of Northwich, and the options located there for growth, one does question whether new growth at Cuddington/Sandiway would simply continue to rely upon Northwich and/or be out-commuting to Manchester


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.

Comment

Representation ID: 9704

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Vistry Group and J Whittingham

I&O_10200
FAR1 suffers from floodrisk and highly constrained access (Townfield Lane) FAR2 comprises some of eth best quality agricultural land in the Borough and certainly out of any option in Farndon its BMV rating ranks head and shoulder above all others – access is constrained to the south and would be reliant off Sibbersfield Lane FAR3 comprises sports pitches / community land


Extension was agreed. Original email was received in time but had errors in question numbers so updated information was requested.