Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 10936

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11434
Yes absolutely.

Comment

Representation ID: 10937

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11435
Circumstances have not changed. Green belt is more important.

Comment

Representation ID: 10938

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11436
No development should be allowed in the Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 10939

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11437
Weaverham Parish Council Supports Option A

Option A - Retain the Green Belt

Comment

Representation ID: 10940

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11438
We need to maximise the use of brown field sites rather than developing in the green belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 10941

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11439
Yes, we must respect the character and needs of the smaller communities. It should centre on the use of brown field sites and infill and should maintain the existing settlement boundary.

Comment

Representation ID: 10942

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11440
Yes it is. 

Comment

Representation ID: 10943

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11441
Option B is not supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 10944

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11442
Option C is not supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 10945

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

I&O_11443
Yes, the constraints are supported. We would like to add the consideration need to be given to the requirement for Schools, Doctors Surgery and Dentist.