Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Search representations

Results for Weaverham Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question NO 5

Representation ID: 10957

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11455
The Council does not want to be part of wider Northwich urban area. Weaverham is large enough and has sufficient services that should merit individual consideration.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question NO 6

Representation ID: 10958

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11456
This should remain unchanged. The Council suggest that the permitted development rights in conservation areas though out the borough should be restricted as currently in Chester.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question GB 1

Representation ID: 10959

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11457
We agree with the suggested policy of keeping the green belt character. However, without details of proposals regarding grey belt it is not possible to make meaningful comment regarding grey belt.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question GB 2

Representation ID: 10961

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11459
No

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question GB 3

Representation ID: 10962

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11460
No

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question GB 4

Representation ID: 10963

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11461
Yes

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question GB 5

Representation ID: 10965

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11463
Through an increased use of the conservation area status.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question TA 1

Representation ID: 10968

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11466
Council supports this approach.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question TA 2

Representation ID: 10970

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11468
Council does not support a hierarchical approach in terms of prioritising transport infrastructure. All transport infrastructure should be provided according to need.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question ID 1

Representation ID: 10971

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11469
Council does not support this policy approach. Development money should not be going to subsidise school transport. This money should only be used for infrastructure e.g. providing pavements.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.