Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for Weaverham Parish Council search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question NO 5
Representation ID: 10957
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11455
The Council does not want to be part of wider Northwich urban area. Weaverham is large enough and has sufficient services that should merit individual consideration.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question NO 6
Representation ID: 10958
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11456
This should remain unchanged. The Council suggest that the permitted development rights in conservation areas though out the borough should be restricted as currently in Chester.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question GB 1
Representation ID: 10959
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11457
We agree with the suggested policy of keeping the green belt character. However, without details of proposals regarding grey belt it is not possible to make meaningful comment regarding grey belt.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question GB 2
Representation ID: 10961
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11459
No
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question GB 3
Representation ID: 10962
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11460
No
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question GB 4
Representation ID: 10963
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11461
Yes
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question GB 5
Representation ID: 10965
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11463
Through an increased use of the conservation area status.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question TA 1
Representation ID: 10968
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11466
Council supports this approach.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question TA 2
Representation ID: 10970
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11468
Council does not support a hierarchical approach in terms of prioritising transport infrastructure. All transport infrastructure should be provided according to need.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question ID 1
Representation ID: 10971
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Parish Council
I&O_11469
Council does not support this policy approach. Development money should not be going to subsidise school transport. This money should only be used for infrastructure e.g. providing pavements.