Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for Weaverham Trust search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question IN 6
Representation ID: 13381
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13900
The following response is submitted on behalf of The Weaverham Trust and reflects the Weaverham Trust's mission to promote the wellbeing of Weaverham by taking positive actions to enhance the natural, built and social environment. The Weaverham Trust are committed to maintaining the natural landscape, quality of life and the amenities and facilities within the village of Weaverham. The neighbourhood plan needs to reflect the character of the settlement, identify future demand for public services such as education and healthcare provision and address transport infrastructure including footpaths and cycling routes.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question OB 1
Representation ID: 13382
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13901
The most appropriate option is Option A - take forward current Local Plan objectives.
Option A - Retain the Green Belt
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SD 3
Representation ID: 13383
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13902
In order to adapt to warmer summers and and mitigate against the effects of climate change new developments, and householder planning applications, should incorporate sustainable design eg solar panels, passive cooling and green infrastructure.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 5
Representation ID: 13384
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13903
Yes, however Weaverham has not been included in the settlements listed despite having a level of facilities and services that mean we can meet the day-to-day needs of our residents, and those of surrounding villages eg Crowton and Norley.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 6
Representation ID: 13385
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13904
Yes, they should be included but development should be appropriate in scale and design to conserve that settlements’ character.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 7
Representation ID: 13386
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13905
Yes, the Local Plan should contain place-based policies for smaller settlements. Weaverham should be included as one of the settlements, as we have a level of facilities and services that mean we can meet the day-to-day needs of our residents and those of surrounding villages eg Crowton and Norley.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 8
Representation ID: 13387
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13906
Yes!
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 10
Representation ID: 13388
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13907
The Green Belt should be retained.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 11
Representation ID: 13389
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13908
Weaverham Trust Supports Option A - Retain the Green Belt
Option A - Retain the Green Belt
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question SS 12
Representation ID: 13390
Received: 29/08/2025
Respondent: Weaverham Trust
I&O_13909
Maximise the use of brownfield sites in Cheshire West and Chester.