Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Weaverham Trust search

New search

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question ID 3

Representation ID: 13401

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_13920
Yes.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question LA 2

Representation ID: 13402

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_13921
Yes. There should be a defined settlement gap surrounding all settlements that currently have a clear gap between that settlement and any adjacent settlements. For example between, Weaverham and Cuddington / Sandiway, Weaverham and Acton Bridge, and Weaverham and Hartford.

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question DS 2

Representation ID: 13403

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Weaverham Trust

Representation Summary:

I&O_13922
Yes.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.