Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 6815

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7247
Yes

Comment

Representation ID: 6816

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7248
They should apply borough-wide, not just remote settlements, as affordability pressures exist in all communities. But the scale and justification must reflect local circumstances.

Comment

Representation ID: 6819

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7254
Yes - but only where essential to cross-subsidise affordable housing and tightly controlled to prevent abuse.

Comment

Representation ID: 6821

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7257
Yes – retain DM 28. Safeguards are important to prevent over-concentration and protect community balance.

Comment

Representation ID: 6826

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7262
Partially - the approach recognises need but should be strengthened: - Any provision must avoid Green Belt release unless exceptional circumstances and all brownfield/urban options are exhausted. - Expansion of existing sites should only occur with clear safeguards for scale, amenity, and local community balance.

Comment

Representation ID: 6831

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7267
Yes – non-Green Belt locations should always be prioritised. Green Belt release should remain exceptional, with a clear hierarchy of preference: 1) brownfield; 2) urban extensions; 3) only then, exceptional Green Belt cases.

Comment

Representation ID: 6832

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7268
No - sustainability tests should not be weakened. Small sites can still generate significant pressures on local services and infrastructure. All sites must demonstrate reasonable access to healthcare, schools, and services, even if at a modest scale.

Comment

Representation ID: 6834

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7270
I can't see this woking for any party involved. 

Comment

Representation ID: 6836

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7272
Unsure

Comment

Representation ID: 6839

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_7275
Yes - policies should: - Protect settlement identity and prevent sites dominating small rural communities. - Consider cumulative impacts where multiple small sites may cluster. - Address site management, waste, and access arrangements to ensure community integration.