Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Search representations

Results for Frodsham Town Council search

New search New search

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question IN 1

Representation ID: 11242

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11740
Yes: Transport assessment – what does it include – needs to cover travel from the home to rail/bus starting point and adequate public transport services

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question IN 2

Representation ID: 11246

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11744
Must involve people from relevant parts of the borough who know the relevant area and how it is used by the community – not just officers with no local knowledge

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question IN 3

Representation ID: 11248

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11746
15 years is fine. But it needs a mechanism for major planning approvals considered towards the end of the 15 year period

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question IN 4

Representation ID: 11250

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11748
Difficult to comment as it has to many IFS and MAYBES. Layout of the final pages in colour and landscape are impossible to read on line

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question IN 5

Representation ID: 11252

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11750
No comment

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question IN 6

Representation ID: 11254

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11752
Many of the Neighbourhood Plans are irrelevant now because of the new NPPF. It is not clear how parcels of land put forward by landowners have been evaluated for suitability, clearly some are certainly not suitable but landowners think their inclusion is the green light to go ahead and build

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question VI 1

Representation ID: 11255

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11753
Vision is OK, but should not be restricted to larger settlements. Every town and village should have a say in their own principles and priorities. Only the community can know what is right for them, not a remote CWaC officer with no knowledge of feel for individual communities

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question VI 2

Representation ID: 11256

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11754
Vision is OK, but should not be restricted to larger settlements. Every town and village should have a say in their own principles and priorities. Only the community can know what is right for them, not a remote CWaC officer with no knowledge of feel for individual communities

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question VI 3

Representation ID: 11257

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11755
Vision is OK, but should not be restricted to larger settlements. Every town and village should have a say in their own principles and priorities. Only the community can know what is right for them, not a remote CWaC officer with no knowledge of feel for individual communities

Comment

Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Question OB 1

Representation ID: 11259

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

Representation Summary:

I&O_11757
Option A
Option A - take forward current Local Plan Objectives

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.