Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 11304

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11802
You failed to communicate with the town and parish councils who are best placed to have detailed knowledge of local issues

Comment

Representation ID: 11305

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11803
None 

Comment

Representation ID: 11306

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

FRO01, FRO02, FRO03
I&O_11804
FRO01 Frodsham EAST: East of Townfield Lane Fully support the many comments from Frodsham residents regarding the protection of our green belt and ancient woodland, Hob Hey Wood. Building adjacent to it would cause serious harm. The remaining land if farmed and important for food production. Access to/from homes on that land would significantly increase traffic on a narrow road already congested with residential parking. FRO02 Frodsham SOUTH: East of Kingsley Road Fully support the many comments from Frodsham residents regarding the historical significance of Bradley fields. Green belt agricultural land and important for food production FRO03 Frodsham WEST: North of Marsh Green Green belt agricultural land and important for food production. Taken alongside Helsby HEL01, Frodsham and Helsby would no have any separation. Area HEL01, as marked on the Helsby Map appears to include part of Frodsham (The boundary is Godscroft Lane)

Comment

Representation ID: 11308

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11806
Traffic congestion, unsuitable roads, residential on-street parking, low bridges on Main Street and Church Street.

Comment

Representation ID: 11309

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11807
Reasonably OK. Release of greenbelt must be a last resort. Landowners with sites specified in the Frodsham Neighbourhood Plan seem to think they have the green light to build larger single homes in an expensive part of the town, contrary to the aspirations of the FNP. It should be made clear that this is not the case. A detailed evaluation of these sites is still necessary

Comment

Representation ID: 11310

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11808
Yes 

Comment

Representation ID: 11312

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11810
Yes 

Comment

Representation ID: 11314

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11812
Don't know 

Comment

Representation ID: 11316

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11814
Yes

Comment

Representation ID: 11317

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Frodsham Town Council

I&O_11815
Don't know