Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for Frodsham Town Council search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question DS 8
Representation ID: 11419
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11917
Yes, but with rigorous checking for compliance
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question DS 9
Representation ID: 11420
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11918
No
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question DS 10
Representation ID: 11421
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11919
Yes
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question EN 1
Representation ID: 11422
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11920
Yes
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question EN 2
Representation ID: 11423
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11921
Only the very poorest agricultural land should be used and only as a last resort
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question EN 3
Representation ID: 11424
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11922
Yes
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question EN 4
Representation ID: 11425
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11923
Yes
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question EN 5
Representation ID: 11426
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11924
Yes
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question EN 6
Representation ID: 11427
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11925
Yes
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question MW 1
Representation ID: 11428
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Frodsham Town Council
I&O_11926
Yes, although Frodsham site should not be expanded, access is poor, causes traffic congestion, access to skips via steps is difficult and dangerous. Alternatives should be developed