Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 8914

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9407
To all settlements regardless of size

Comment

Representation ID: 8915

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9408
Yes - as recognised by NPPF82

Comment

Representation ID: 8916

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9409
No – the policy should remove the wording “potentially requiring provision on larger residential sites”.

Comment

Representation ID: 8917

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9410
No – this is not appropriate as it would tie large scale allocations to the delivery of a product that is unknown and uncontrolled

Comment

Representation ID: 8918

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9411
Evidence is needed to justify the demand otherwise the Authority is simply going to attract more uncontrolled and unsustainable camps from outside of the Borough – for instance if the housing need is 29,000 this equates to 232 pitches

Comment

Representation ID: 8919

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9412
No and R2 could be deleted. R2 was a “reaction” policy to an overwhelming demand at a point in time due to intense pressure placed upon the settlement by speculative developments. Tattenhall is not a special case. However, it is important to recognise that the plans overarching spatial and sustainable development polices recognise the demands placed upon all rural settlements and the need to deliver sustainable levels of development that maintain and enhance sustainability.