Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 8880

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9373
Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.

Comment

Representation ID: 8881

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9374
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.

Comment

Representation ID: 8882

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9375
No

Comment

Representation ID: 8883

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9376
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.

Comment

Representation ID: 8884

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9377
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.

Comment

Representation ID: 8885

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9378
No – retaining and not amending DM19 is a mistake for the following reasons: • Few sites in the rural area meet the Brownfield Register threshold • Many sites may not have access to public transport (see NPPF 110) • The bar is set too high by Criterion 7 in DM19 not to lead to a high degree of subjectivity creeping in • NPPF provides overarching guidance and any policy must reflect Grey Belt guidance in this and the PPG

Comment

Representation ID: 8886

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9379
It may be beneficial – although there is no reason why the countryside policy cannot be combined and duplicate the GB elements in that sites in the countryside are provided with the same exceptions provided for Green Belt through the NPPF – for example, there is no rational reason why GB sites can be redeveloped/converted and open countryside ones are unable to benefit from such provision

Comment

Representation ID: 8887

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9380
Employment, tourism, recreation and residential uses are (and can be) appropriate alternative uses in the countryside

Comment

Representation ID: 8888

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9381
No

Comment

Representation ID: 8890

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9383
Through a sensibly worded policy that seeks to protect heritage assets and recognise that structural tests may be relevant and design solutions are sympathetic as opposed to being obstructive