Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 8850

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9343
Largely unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station, school and pub but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance.

Comment

Representation ID: 8852

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9345
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has no other support services and facilities.

Support

Representation ID: 8855

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9348
Largely unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station, school and pub but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance. We do, however, see merit in ELT01, 2 and 3.

Comment

Representation ID: 8859

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9352
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has no other support services and facilities.

Comment

Representation ID: 8860

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9353
Largely unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station, school and pub but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance. We do, however, see some merit in LOS2 and 3 but they do have access issues to contend with.

Comment

Representation ID: 8861

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9354
Totally unsustainable for anything coming forward that exceeds the suggested growth we have suggested for Local Service Centres – we recognise it has a rail station and a pub, but this does not justify developing anything of scale and substance in a community that has no other support services and facilities.

Comment

Representation ID: 8862

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9355
Yes, but it could be enhanced - Chester should be identified as the principle “driver for growth” in the Borough. Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough.

Comment

Representation ID: 8863

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9356
No

Comment

Representation ID: 8864

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9357
No

Comment

Representation ID: 8865

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9358
Maybe