Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 8867

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9360
Yes

Comment

Representation ID: 8869

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9362
Yes

Comment

Representation ID: 8870

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9363
Yes

Comment

Representation ID: 8871

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9364
Maybe, subject to what is proposed

Comment

Representation ID: 8872

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9365
No

Comment

Representation ID: 8873

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9366
Yes

Comment

Representation ID: 8874

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9367
Yes, but it could be enhanced - Given its status and scale it ought to accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough.

Comment

Representation ID: 8875

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9368
Yes – but given its status and scale it ought to only accommodate a scale of new growth that is commensurate with its population share of the Borough and not exceed this.

Comment

Representation ID: 8876

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9369
No – apart from the vulnerability of Winnington as a location for potential housing delivery

Comment

Representation ID: 8878

Received: 03/09/2025

Respondent: Trustees of G A Artell

Agent: J10 Planning

I&O_9371
Yes – to provide and maintain local distinctiveness and separation