Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 5931

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6319
I believe the approach should be far more flexible. The current site outlined for warehousing would be better used for residential development and facilities. The ambition of building a new railway station would suit this type of use, given the connectivty needs and space available. It would also be in keeping with the development over the road, and more sympathetic to the crematorium next door. 

Comment

Representation ID: 5934

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6322
I support the proposals, aside from the WIN01 employment site which would be unsuitable given the location and traffic levels. I also endorse the practical measures to support the Key Settlement Gaps and would reccomend the continuation of the settlement boundaries in Bostock and Moulton.

Comment

Representation ID: 5935

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6323
Exclude WIN01 site in Bostock.

Comment

Representation ID: 5940

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6329
Broadly support, but I would wish to endorse further bus connectivity into the rural areas and the building of new railway stations in Gadbrook Park and Tarporley and Beeston.

Comment

Representation ID: 5942

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6331
I support these.

Comment

Representation ID: 5946

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6335
I would wish to see further junction improvements betwee the A556 and A533 in Davenham, Kingsmead and Leftwich, as well as the Jack Lane/A533 junction in Bostock/Moulton. 

Comment

Representation ID: 5947

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6336
All development. I also believe the definition should be to those with a material impact on or to the communities being built in.

Comment

Representation ID: 5952

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6341
Either full cost or provide fully funded plans from day 1 with the council or approved suppliers/support.

Comment

Representation ID: 5954

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6343
Yes. further should be considered towards the bus provisions.

Comment

Representation ID: 6470

Received: 29/08/2025

Respondent: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Councillors)

I&O_6885
The listed evidence is necessary but incomplete. Additional evidence should include: - A robust and up-to-date Housing Needs Assessment (LHNA) before housing numbers are set. Current figures (1,914 homes/year) are arbitrary and risk being found unsound without this. - A Settlement Character & Identity Study, to identify and protect distinct gaps between villages and prevent coalescence. - A Transport and Infrastructure Phasing Plan, including realistic solutions for the Winnington bridge and congestion pinch points in Northwich, alongside HGV impact assessments from Hynet and Winnington Solar Development. - A Food Security & Agricultural Land Study, to balance housing and renewable energy against the long-term need for productive farmland.