Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for Penmar Farming Limited search
New searchComment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question CH 6
Representation ID: 5396
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy CH1
I&O_5767
Yes, it is important to protect and promote the use of this area for high quality office space, to support employment growth over the Plan period.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question CH 7
Representation ID: 5397
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy CH1
I&O_5768
Yes.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question CH 8
Representation ID: 5399
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy CH1
I&O_5770
Yes. Also support the proposed prohibition on new residential development within Chester Business Park, because it is important sufficient space is retained for employment growth over the Plan period.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question CH 10
Representation ID: 5400
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy CH1
I&O_5771
Yes.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question EP 1
Representation ID: 5407
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy EP1
I&O_5778
Yes, to support the town’s role in both the sub-region and within Cheshire West and Chester, especially to support employment growth over the plan period.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question EP 3
Representation ID: 5409
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy EP2
I&O_5781
Yes, to support employment growth over the plan period.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question NO 1
Representation ID: 5411
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy NO1
I&O_5783
In part yes, in part no, not entirely. Yes, to support the town’s role within Cheshire West and Chester, especially to support employment growth over the plan period. No, not entirely. It should be amended to remove the reference to the retention of so-called ‘key settlement gaps’, identified in Local Plan Part Two Policy GBC3. The retention or not of gaps between settlements in the green belt should align with national planning policy on the green belt.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question NO 7
Representation ID: 5412
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy NO2
I&O_5784
Yes, to support employment growth over the plan period.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question NO 8
Representation ID: 5413
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy NO2
I&O_5785
Yes, to support employment growth over the plan period.
Comment
Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)
Question WI 1
Representation ID: 5416
Received: 28/08/2025
Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited
Suggested policy WI 1
I&O_5788
Yes, to support the town’s role within Cheshire West and Chester, especially to support employment growth over the plan period.