Local Plan Issues and Options (Regulation 18)

Comment

Representation ID: 5490

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited

Suggested policy GI 1
I&O_5862
No, because there are no identified locally specific reasons to go above ten per cent. Notwithstanding that, going above ten per cent may also adversely impact site yield (number of dwellings) and viability.

Comment

Representation ID: 5492

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited

Suggested policy HE 1
I&O_5864
No, the policy should not repeat national policy. Instead, it should defer to national policy, in the Framework and in Guidance.

Comment

Representation ID: 5496

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited

Suggested policy DS 2
I&O_5868
No, the policy should not repeat national guidance. Instead, it should defer to relevant national guidance.

Comment

Representation ID: 5499

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited

Suggested policy DS 2
I&O_5871
No, because there are no identified locally specific reasons to set a higher local standard.

Comment

Representation ID: 5500

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited

Suggested policy DS 2
I&O_5872
Yes.

Comment

Representation ID: 5505

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited

Suggested policy DS 2
I&O_5877
There should be no upper or lower limit on the type and size of development that the alternative compliance should apply to.

Comment

Representation ID: 5508

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited

Suggested policy MS 1
I&O_5880
Yes, but it should be made clear whether the prospective level of house building (to accord with national policy) has been taken into account. If it has not then the level of demand will have been underestimated and consideration may need to be given to either further extending existing sites or permitting new ones (for sand and gravel).

Comment

Representation ID: 5509

Received: 28/08/2025

Respondent: Penmar Farming Limited

Suggested policy MS 2
I&O_5881
No, because it should be made clear whether the prospective level of house building (to accord with national policy) has been taken into account. If it has not then the level of demand will have been underestimated and consideration may need to be given to either further extending existing sites or permitting new ones (for sand and gravel).